enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Vacco v. Quill - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacco_v._Quill

    Vacco v. Quill, 521 U.S. 793 (1997), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the right to die.It ruled 9–0 that a New York ban on physician-assisted suicide was constitutional, and preventing doctors from assisting their patients, even those terminally ill and/or in great pain, was a legitimate state interest that was well within the authority of the state ...

  3. Washington v. Glucksberg - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_v._Glucksberg

    They claimed that assisted suicide was a liberty interest protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. On May 3, 1994, US District Court Judge Barbara Jacobs Rothstein ruled in favor of Glucksberg. [2]

  4. Assisted suicide in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assisted_suicide_in_the...

    In 1994, a suit was filed in New York claiming that the anti-assisted suicide statute was a violation of equal protection and liberty guarantees of the Fourteenth Amendment. This claim was rejected by the District Court on the basis that there is no right to assisted suicide given by the U.S. Constitution.

  5. Will NY approve medically assisted suicide? What doctors ...

    www.aol.com/ny-approve-medically-assisted...

    The medical aid in dying act — the latest in a series of physician-assisted suicide bills proposed since 2015 — has gained momentum in recent weeks after a top physician trade group in New ...

  6. West Virginia Voters Passed a Constitutional Amendment ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/west-virginia-voters-passed...

    Physician-assisted suicide was already illegal in West Virginia, but the constitutional amendment put on the ballot there was a response to legalization efforts in other states.

  7. Right to die - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_die

    Glucksberg [57]) statutes that made physician-assisted suicide a felony violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. [58] In a unanimous vote, the Court held that there was no constitutional right to physician-assisted suicide and upheld state bans on assisted suicide.

  8. Assisted dying bill could be axed before MPs have ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/assisted-dying-bill-could-axed...

    While concerns have been raised over coercion and mission creep, Kim Leadbeater has described her bill as the most robust in the world

  9. List of landmark court decisions in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    Quill, 521 U.S. 793 (1997) New York's prohibition on assisted suicide does not violate the Equal Protection Clause. Gonzales v. Oregon , 546 U.S. 243 (2006) The Controlled Substances Act does not prevent physicians from being able to prescribe the drugs needed to perform assisted suicides under state law.