enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Pro se legal representation (/ ˌ p r oʊ ˈ s iː / or / ˌ p r oʊ ˈ s eɪ /) means to argue on one's own behalf in a legal proceeding, as a defendant or plaintiff in civil cases, or a defendant in criminal cases, rather than have representation from counsel or an attorney. The term pro se comes from Latin pro se, meaning "for oneself" or ...

  3. Ex parte - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_parte

    State courts vary in their use of ex parte proceedings (for example, in custody cases, replevin cases and other civil matters), though most have it in one form or another. For example, in the States of California and Illinois, ex parte proceedings are available if notice is given before 10 a.m. the previous court day, or even shorter upon ...

  4. List of United States Supreme Court cases involving standing

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    This was a landmark case, prior to this, private citizens were permitted to litigate public rights. 9–0 Frothingham v. Mellon: 1923: Held that the generalized injury of higher taxation overall was insufficient to give a taxpayer standing to challenge federal spending. Considered the genesis of the doctrine of standing. [2] 9–0 Poe v. Ullman ...

  5. Ex rel. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_rel.

    The private party is called the relator in such a case. The government acts on the basis of the narration or recounting (Latin relatione ) of the alleged facts by the relator. Governments typically accept applications and commence litigation for ex rel. actions only if the interest advanced by the private party is similar to the interest of the ...

  6. Third-party standing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_standing

    [7] In such cases the courts often allow third parties vicariously to vindicate the rights of a non-litigant rights possessor. In Pierce v. Society of Sisters, [8] a state statute required all parents to send their children to public schools. A private and a parochial school brought suit to enjoin enforcement of the act on the ground that it ...

  7. McCleary v. Washington - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCleary_v._Washington

    On June 7, 2018, the Supreme Court declared the state had fully covered the funding of basic education, lifting the contempt order and $100,000 a day fine, ending any judicial oversight of the case. [10] [11] In the McCleary ruling, the Supreme Court cited teacher pay as a primary issue with the failure of the state to fund public education. [12]

  8. Where the fight over USAID’s future stands - AOL

    www.aol.com/where-fight-over-usaid-future...

    The future of the government’s foreign assistance agency hangs in the balance after a federal judge temporarily paused the Trump administration’s plan to place thousands of employees on leave ...

  9. Next friend - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Next_friend

    This disability often arises from minority, mental incapacity, or lack of access to counsel.Consequently, every application to the court on behalf of a minor, a mentally incapacitated person, or a person detained without access to an attorney, who does not have a legal guardian or someone authorized to act on his or her behalf with a power of attorney, must be made through a next friend ...