enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Lefkowitz v. Great Minneapolis Surplus Store, Inc - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lefkowitz_v._Great...

    Great Minneapolis Surplus Store, Inc 86 NW 2d 689 (Minn, 1957) is an American contract law case. It concerns the distinction between an offer and an invitation to treat . The case held that a clear, definite, explicit and non-negotiable advertisement constitutes an offer, acceptance of which creates a binding contract.

  3. United States District Court for the District of Minnesota

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_District...

    Minneapolis: 1953 1995–2023 2015–2022 2023–present Clinton: 30 Senior Judge Ann D. Montgomery: Minneapolis: 1949 1996–2016 — 2016–present Clinton: 31 Senior Judge Donovan W. Frank: Saint Paul: 1951 1998–2016 — 2016–present Clinton: 32 Senior Judge Joan N. Ericksen: Minneapolis: 1954 2002–2019 — 2019–present G.W. Bush: 34 ...

  4. Dorsey & Whitney - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorsey_&_Whitney

    Dorsey & Whitney LLP (known as Dorsey) is a law firm based in the United States with approximately 580 attorneys, located between 21 offices in the United States, Canada, Europe, and Asia as of 2023. The firm's headquarters is in Minneapolis, Minnesota, where it was founded. [1] As of 2023, Dorsey is led by managing partner William R. Stoeri. [2]

  5. Gray Plant Mooty - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gray_Plant_Mooty

    Gray Plant Mooty opened a third office in Washington, D.C. in 2005 and a fourth office in Fargo, North Dakota in 2014. [3] In June 2015, the firm announced a merger with Fargo firm Sandin Law. [4] In January 2020, the firm combined with Lathrop & Gage to form a new firm, Lathrop GPM LLP. [5]

  6. United Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Automobile_Workers...

    United Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls, Inc. , 499 U.S. 187 (1991), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States establishing that private sector policies prohibiting women from knowingly working in potentially hazardous occupations are discriminatory and in violation of Title VII and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 ...

  7. United States v. Johnson (1968) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Johnson...

    Justice Douglas reversed for a 5-3 majority. He held that the provisions of 207(b) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 making the remedies provided in Title II of the Act the exclusive means of enforcing rights based on such part do not preclude a criminal prosecution of the defendants under 18 USC 241, since the exclusive-remedy provision applies only to enforcement of substantive rights to ...

  8. Lawsuit says ex-Officer Chauvin kneeled on woman's neck ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/lawsuit-says-ex-officer-chauvin...

    A former employee sued the city of Minneapolis on Tuesday, alleging ex-police Officer Derek Chauvin hauled her from her minivan and pinned her to the ground with his knee in January 2020, just as ...

  9. United States v. Johnson (1943) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Johnson...

    Iowa, 18 Wall. 129, 134-35; Atherton Mills v. Johnston, 259 U.S. 13, 15. Whenever in the course of litigation such a defect in the proceedings is brought to the court's attention, it may set aside any adjudication thus procured and dismiss the cause without entering judgment on the [**1077] merits.