Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
China’s policies differ from Western nations, in that their perception of privacy is different due to historical and cultural reasons. [ 3 ] During the drafting process, the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") was used as a model and in some areas, PIPL closely tracks the GDPR.
The Internet real-name system in China is a real-name system in which Internet service providers and Internet content providers (especially user-generated content sites) in the People's Republic of China are required to collect users' real names, ID numbers, and other information when providing services. Since the implementation of the real ...
Zhao C (Chinese: 赵C; pinyin: Zhào C) is a well-known example, having attracted much media attention [11] [12] due to a bizarre case regarding a forced name change by the government due to naming regulations. This case is the first of name rights in the People's Republic of China. [13]
The chief executive of China's Weibo on Friday confirmed that China may start denying anonymity to online commentators on politics and finance by requiring them to display their names on their ...
China Real-Name Decentralized Identifier System (China RealDID, Chinese: 实名DID) is China's national-level decentralized identifier system. [1] China RealDID was officially launched on December 12, 2023, by the First Research Institute of China's Ministry of Public Security and the Blockchain-based Service Network (BSN) China.
The U.S. has long accused China of intellectual property theft and the issue has been a key sore point in U.S.-China relations. But this is the first time the Five Eyes members have joined ...
The Resident Identity Card (Chinese: 居民身份证; pinyin: Jūmín Shēnfènzhèng) is an official identity document for personal identification in the People's Republic of China. According to the second chapter, tenth clause of the Resident Identity Card Law , residents are required to apply for resident identity cards from the local Public ...
Focusing on I.P.-intensive U.S. firms operating in China in 2009, the report claims these firms "reported losses of approximately $48.2 billion in sales, royalties, or license fees" due to I.P ...