Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Trivia questions for kids can be brain-bending fun for the whole family. Asking kids thought-provoking questions is a great way to engage their critical-thinking skills, according to Laura Linn ...
{{Example needed}} to mark individual phrases or sentences which require examples for clarification {} to mark individual phrases or sections which require further explanation for general (i.e. non-expert) readers {{Non sequitur}} to mark individual mentions of someone or something in an out-of-context way, the relevance of which is unclear
35 clever brainteasers for kids with answers. What is the end of everything? The letter "G." I follow you all the time and copy your every move, but you can’t touch me. What am I? Your shadow.
Use this inline template as a request for other editors to clarify text that is difficult to understand. Place immediately after the material in question. Template parameters [Edit template data] Parameter Description Type Status Reason reason A brief reason for the tag. Avoid using wikilinks, as they will be converted to plain text in the output. String suggested Text text Text fragment ...
Socratic questioning (or Socratic maieutics) [1] is an educational method named after Socrates that focuses on discovering answers by asking questions of students. According to Plato, Socrates believed that "the disciplined practice of thoughtful questioning enables the scholar/student to examine ideas and be able to determine the validity of those ideas". [2]
An email patterned in BLUF declares the purpose of the email and action required. The subject of the email states exactly what the email is about. The body of the message should quickly answer the five Ws: who, what, where, when, and why. The first few sentences explains the purpose and reason of the email and continues to give supporting details.
Questioning the question by: requesting clarification; reflecting the question back to the questioner, for example saying "you tell me" Attacking the question by saying: "the question fails to address the important issue" "the question is hypothetical or speculative" "the question is based on a false premise" "the question is factually inaccurate"
Lack of support to help the investigator provide the right answer to "why" questions. Results are not repeatable – different people using five whys come up with different causes for the same problem. Tendency to isolate a single root cause, whereas each question could elicit many different root causes.