enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Pro se legal representation (/ ˌ p r oʊ ˈ s iː / or / ˌ p r oʊ ˈ s eɪ /) means to argue on one's own behalf in a legal proceeding, as a defendant or plaintiff in civil cases, or a defendant in criminal cases, rather than have representation from counsel or an attorney. The term pro se comes from Latin pro se, meaning "for oneself" or ...

  3. Faretta v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faretta_v._California

    Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that criminal defendants have a constitutional right to refuse counsel and represent themselves in state criminal proceedings.

  4. List of U.S. state constitutional provisions allowing self ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._State...

    In dealing with the pro se litigant, a judge must remain impartial but ensure that the litigant receives a fair hearing. If the judge does too much to help the party, she risks becoming an advocate; if she does too little, the party is denied the fundamental right to a fair hearing.

  5. File:United States v. Larson Pro-Se Motion 2021.pdf - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:United_States_v...

    This file is a work of a United States federal court, taken or made as part of that person's official duties.As a work of the United States Federal Government, the file is in the public domain in the United States.

  6. Anders v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anders_v._California

    The Supreme Court ruled that any such motion must be accompanied by a brief (commonly referred to as an Anders brief) outlining the case and any potential (albeit possibly frivolous) grounds for appeal, that the appellate court must independently review the case, and that a defendant must be allowed the right to appeal either pro se or by other ...

  7. Continuance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuance

    A more typical finding is seen in Swindler v. State, [34] a 1991 case from Arkansas that upheld the death penalty and rejected challenges to jury bias and change of venue motion where three jurors were seated who had read and heard about the case, and over 80% of the jurors called were excused for cause. Extensive case law is discussed.

  8. Upgrade to a faster, more secure version of a supported browser. It's free and it only takes a few moments:

  9. Pro hac vice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pro_hac_vice

    At common law, an attorney not licensed to practice in a particular jurisdiction may be permitted to appear pro hac vice. In the legal field in the United States, pro hac vice (English: / p r oʊ h æ k ˈ v iː tʃ eɪ /) [1] is a practice in common law jurisdictions whereby a lawyer who has not been admitted to practice in a certain jurisdiction is allowed to participate in a particular case ...