enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Precision and recall - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precision_and_recall

    To calculate the recall for a given class, we divide the number of true positives by the prevalence of this class (number of times that the class occurs in the data sample). The class-wise precision and recall values can then be combined into an overall multi-class evaluation score, e.g., using the macro F1 metric. [21]

  3. F-score - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-score

    Precision and recall. In statistical analysis of binary classification and information retrieval systems, the F-score or F-measure is a measure of predictive performance. It is calculated from the precision and recall of the test, where the precision is the number of true positive results divided by the number of all samples predicted to be positive, including those not identified correctly ...

  4. Evaluation measures (information retrieval) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evaluation_measures...

    By computing a precision and recall at every position in the ranked sequence of documents, one can plot a precision-recall curve, plotting precision () as a function of recall . Average precision computes the average value of p ( r ) {\displaystyle p(r)} over the interval from r = 0 {\displaystyle r=0} to r = 1 {\displaystyle r=1} : [ 7 ]

  5. File:Precision and recall.pdf - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Precision_and_recall.pdf

    You are free: to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work; to remix – to adapt the work; Under the following conditions: attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.

  6. Confusion matrix - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confusion_matrix

    The overall accuracy would be 95%, but in more detail the classifier would have a 100% recognition rate (sensitivity) for the cancer class but a 0% recognition rate for the non-cancer class. F1 score is even more unreliable in such cases, and here would yield over 97.4%, whereas informedness removes such bias and yields 0 as the probability of ...

  7. Positive and negative predictive values - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_and_negative...

    The positive predictive value (PPV), or precision, is defined as = + = where a "true positive" is the event that the test makes a positive prediction, and the subject has a positive result under the gold standard, and a "false positive" is the event that the test makes a positive prediction, and the subject has a negative result under the gold standard.

  8. Phi coefficient - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phi_coefficient

    In statistics, the phi coefficient (or mean square contingency coefficient and denoted by φ or r φ) is a measure of association for two binary variables.. In machine learning, it is known as the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) and used as a measure of the quality of binary (two-class) classifications, introduced by biochemist Brian W. Matthews in 1975.

  9. Accuracy paradox - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accuracy_paradox

    Even though the accuracy is ⁠ 10 + 999000 / 1000000 ⁠ ≈ 99.9%, 990 out of the 1000 positive predictions are incorrect. The precision of ⁠ 10 / 10 + 990 ⁠ = 1% reveals its poor performance. As the classes are so unbalanced, a better metric is the F1 score = ⁠ 2 × 0.01 × 1 / 0.01 + 1 ⁠ ≈ 2% (the recall being ⁠ 10 + 0 / 10 ...