Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC), a plaintiff in the California case, welcomed the parts of the 9th Circuit's ruling that rejected the state's defense of certain location-specific gun restrictions.
Seal of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. On February 7, 2012, a three-judge panel on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a 2–1 majority opinion affirming the judgment in Perry v. Schwarzenegger, which declared Proposition 8 unconstitutional, saying it violated the Equal Protection Clause.
In reviewing Johnson vs. Grants Pass, the court could undo the 9th Circuit's Martin vs. Boise opinion, which limits punishment of homeless people.
California may enforce its recent ban on guns in some 'sensitive places,' but not others, a three-judge panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Friday.
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Judgeship and Reorganization Act of 2017, H.R. 196 [24] The more recent proposals have aimed to redefine the Ninth Circuit to cover California, Hawaii, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands, and to create a new Twelfth Circuit to cover Alaska, Arizona, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington.
His first published opinion for the Ninth Circuit was United States v. Zalapa, which dealt with multiplicity of criminal convictions. [7] In February 2012, Smith authored a dissent to the Ninth Circuit's decision in Perry v. Brown holding California Proposition 8 unconstitutional.
The decision leaves intact almost all the provisions in three statutes enacted by the Democratic-controlled Legislature to thwart the federal government's crackdown on undocumented immigrants.
The Ninth Circuit has yet to define the appropriate standard for commercial speech in discovery disputes. [9] [10] The Ninth Circuit's decision in this case will likely be influential. Many "subpoena targets" such as Google, Yahoo! and Bing are located in the Ninth Circuit and are therefore affected by the decision in Anonymous Online Speakers.