Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The website displays the case information entered into the Consolidated Court Automation Programs (CCAP) case management system by court staff in the counties where the case files are located. The court record summaries provided by the system are all public records under Wisconsin open records law sections 19.31-19.39 of the Wisconsin Statutes.
Vosburg v. Putney, 80 Wis. 523, 50 N.W. 403 (Wisc. 1891), was an American torts case that helped establish the scope of liability in a battery.The case involved an incident that occurred on February 20, 1889 in Waukesha, Wisconsin.
Jury Verdict Research, a database of plaintiff and defense verdicts, says awards in medical liability cases increased 43 percent in 1999, from $700,000 to $1,000,000. However, more recent research from the U.S. Department of Justice has found that median medical malpractice awards in states range from $109,000 to $195,000. [28]
Medical malpractice case law (22 P) D. Deaths from medical malpractice (15 P) E. Medical experimentation on prisoners (2 C, 12 P) F. Films about medical malpractice ...
Pages in category "Medical malpractice case law" The following 22 pages are in this category, out of 22 total. This list may not reflect recent changes. A.
Texas City Disaster#Legal case; Texas Youth Commission#ACLU lawsuit; The Brick#Lawsuit; The Chiari Institute#Lawsuits; Thomas Jefferson School of Law#2011 class action lawsuit against TJSL; Thomas M. Cooley Law School#Class action against Cooley; Three Cups of Tea#Lawsuits; TracFone Wireless#Class action; True (dating service)#:0
In common law jurisdictions, medical malpractice liability is normally based on the tort of negligence. [3]Although the law of medical malpractice differs significantly between nations, as a broad general rule liability follows when a health care practitioner does not show a fair, reasonable and competent degree of skill when providing medical care to a patient. [3]
Richards v. Wisconsin, 529 U.S. 385 (1997), was a case before the United States Supreme Court in which the Court held that the Fourth Amendment does not allow a blanket exception to the knock-and-announce rule for investigations of drug-related felonies.