enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. The Right and the Good - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Right_and_the_Good

    The Right and the Good is a 1930 book by the Scottish philosopher David Ross. In it, Ross develops a deontological pluralism based on prima facie duties. Ross defends a realist position about morality and an intuitionist position about moral knowledge.

  3. W. D. Ross - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._D._Ross

    In The Right and the Good, Ross lists seven prima facie duties, without claiming his list to be all-inclusive: fidelity; reparation; gratitude; justice; beneficence; non-maleficence; and self-improvement. In any given situation, any number of these prima facie duties may apply. In the case of ethical dilemmas, they may even contradict one another.

  4. Deontology - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deontology

    W. D. Ross objects to Kant's monistic deontology, which bases ethics in only one foundational principle, the categorical imperative. He contends that there is a plurality (7, although this number is seen to vary to interpretation) of prima facie duties determining what is right. [19] [20]: xii These duties are identified by W. D. Ross:

  5. Template talk:User Prima Facie Duties + David Ross - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:User_Prima...

    Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate

  6. Negative and positive rights - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_and_positive_rights

    Some critics of positive rights implicitly suggest that because positive obligations are not reliably prima facie, they must always be agreed to through contract. [1] Nineteenth-century philosopher Frédéric Bastiat summarized the conflict between these negative and positive rights by saying:

  7. Prima facie right - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prima_facie_right

    A prima facie right is a right that can be outweighed by other considerations. It stands in contrast with absolute rights , which cannot be outweighed by anything. Some authors consider an absolute right as a prima facie right, but one that cannot be outweighed in any possible situation. [ 1 ]

  8. Does Moral Philosophy Rest on a Mistake? - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Does_Moral_Philosophy_Rest...

    [2]: 8 In spite of their neglect of the period of British moral philosophy between Sidgwick and the Second World War, Prichard's "Mistake" was among the few works of that period (alongside Moore's Principia Ethica and the chapter of Ross's The Right and the Good on prima facie duties) which continued to be read. [2]: 2

  9. Principlism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principlism

    Principlism is an applied ethics approach to the examination of moral dilemmas centering the application of certain ethical principles. This approach to ethical decision-making has been prevalently adopted in various professional fields, largely because it sidesteps complex debates in moral philosophy at the theoretical level.