Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In Harvard, SFFA asked if Harvard's admission practices were in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act given possible race-neutral selection processes, while in North Carolina, they asked if a university can reject a race-neutral admission process if they believe they need to protect the diversity of the student body and quality of ...
The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday ruled against UNC-Chapel Hill’s race-conscious undergraduate admissions policy, saying the university’s consideration of race in admissions is a violation of ...
The case, which challenges how colleges and universities should consider race in the admissions process, could have sweeping implications for affirmative action in higher education.
Harvard (2023), and its companion case Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina (2023), the Supreme Court held that race and ethnicity cannot be used in admissions decisions. In other words, preferential treatment based on race or ethnicity violates The Equal Protection Clause.
Scarborough, the UNC student, said he believes it is “crucial” for the Board of Governors to represent the demographics of the state, given the UNC System’s mission to serve the people of ...
The UNC System Board of Governors appears poised to take action on diversity, equity and inclusion, or DEI, in North Carolina’s public university system, potentially eliminating administrative ...
Lewis Sargentich first analyzed and named the doctrine in 1970, in a famous note published in the Harvard Law Review, The First Amendment Overbreadth Doctrine (83 Harv. L. Rev. 844). Citing Sargentich's note, the U.S. Supreme Court explicitly recognized the doctrine in 1973 in Broadrick v.
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us