enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Comstock Act of 1873 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comstock_Act_of_1873

    While an earlier version did exist, as Sec. 5. of the Act for the Suppression of Trade in, and Circulation of, Obscene Literature and Articles of Immoral Use, [3] the modern version was initially enacted under Sec. 305. of the Tariff Act of 1930 and is currently codified (in a non-positive law title) at section 1305 of title 19, United States ...

  3. United States obscenity law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_obscenity_law

    United States obscenity law deals with the regulation or suppression of what is considered obscenity and therefore not protected speech or expression under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. In the United States, discussion of obscenity typically relates to defining what pornography is obscene. Issues of obscenity arise at ...

  4. Roth v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roth_v._United_States

    Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957), along with its companion case Alberts v.California, was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States which redefined the constitutional test for determining what constitutes obscene material unprotected by the First Amendment. [1]

  5. Book censorship in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_censorship_in_the...

    On March 3, 1873, the Comstock Law was passed by the United States Congress under the Grant administration; also referred to as an Act for the "Suppression of Trade in, and Circulation of, Obscene Literature and Articles of

  6. Obscenity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obscenity

    These common-law ideas of obscenity formed the original basis of obscenity law in other common law countries, such as the United States. The classic definition of criminal obscenity is if it "tends to deprave and corrupt", stated in 1868 by Lord Justice Cockburn, in Regina v. Hicklin, now known as the Hicklin test.

  7. Ginzburg v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ginzburg_v._United_States

    The First Amendment puts protection for expressive content in terms that are both sweeping and absolute: "Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press" [2] Despite this broad protection, the roots of U.S. attempts to legally suppress obscenity extend back to the English common law offense of obscene libel and censorship of stage plays by the Master of the Revels.

  8. Miller test - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_test

    The Miller test, also called the three-prong obscenity test, is the United States Supreme Court's test for determining whether speech or expression can be labeled obscene, in which case it is not protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and can be prohibited.

  9. Foreign trade of the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_trade_of_the...

    The authority of Congress to regulate international trade is set out in the United States Constitution (Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 1): . The Congress shall have power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and to promote the general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform ...