Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A solution to the problem is to adopt impersonal views, theories that don't rely on the notion of personal identity, such as utilitarianism. But impersonal views lead to what Parfit calls the " repugnant conclusion ", the idea that "For any perfectly equal population with very high positive welfare, there is a population with very low positive ...
The non-identity problem arises from the observation that actions taken today can fundamentally alter which future people come into existence. In chapter 16 of Reasons and Persons , Parfit posits that one's existence is intimately related to the time and conditions of one's conception.
Reasons and Persons is a 1984 book by the philosopher Derek Parfit, in which the author discusses ethics, rationality and personal identity.. It is divided into four parts, dedicated to self-defeating theories, rationality and time, personal identity and responsibility toward future generations.
The mere addition paradox (also known as the repugnant conclusion) is a problem in ethics identified by Derek Parfit and discussed in his book Reasons and Persons (1984). The paradox identifies the mutual incompatibility of four intuitively compelling assertions about the relative value of populations.
A constant problem in mathematics, an indistinctness over whether an expression equals zero. Topics referred to by the same term This disambiguation page lists articles associated with the title Identity problem .
The "No-Problem" Problem refers to an often spoken facet of systemic bias, whereby exclusion of minorities or marginalized people and knowledge occurs because the issue is perceived as either not a problem, or not the speaker's problem. The term was defined in 1990 by Deborah Rhode who published a paper by this title in the 1991 Yale Law ...
Identity disorder in the DSM was first listed as a separate diagnosis in version III (1980). [1] In the DSM-IV (1994), it was replaced by " Identity problem ", which was not defined as a mental disorder per se, but was listed in the chapter "Other Conditions That May Be a Focus of Clinical Attention". [ 2 ]
It is also known as a 'criterion of identity' or 'indiscernibility principle'. The history of the consideration of such a principle begins with Aristotle . [ 2 ] It was much discussed by the medieval philosopher Duns Scotus (c. 1266–1308) with his " haecceity " and later, during Renaissance , by Francisco Suárez (1548–1617), Bonaventure ...