enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Legal aspects of file sharing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_aspects_of_file_sharing

    File sharing is the practice of distributing or providing access to digital media, such as computer programs, multimedia (audios, photos and/or videos), program files, documents or electronic books/magazines. It involves various legal aspects as it is often used to exchange data that is copyrighted or licensed.

  3. Online piracy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_piracy

    [6] [7] It allowed users to share content via peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing and was one of the first mainstream uses of this distribution methods as it made it easy for regular users to get free music. Napster's popular use would only be short lived, as on July 27, 2000, it was ordered to be shut down by a federal judge; it was officially ...

  4. Legal issues with BitTorrent - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_issues_with_BitTorrent

    BitTorrent files and links can be accessed in different geographic locations and legal jurisdictions. Thus, it is possible to host a BitTorrent file in geographic jurisdictions where it is legal and others where it is illegal. A single link, file or data or download action may be actionable in some places, but not in others.

  5. Illegal file-sharing costly at $80,000 per song - AOL

    www.aol.com/2009/06/19/bad-idea-illegal-file-sharing

    The Universal Music Group and other music labels won a $1.92 million judgment against a Minnesota woman who illegally shared 80 songs with other users over Kazaa, the popular online file-sharing ...

  6. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A&M_Records,_Inc._v...

    A number of file-sharing networks surfaced in Napster's wake, including Morpheus, Grokster, and KaZaA, many of which faced their own legal challenges over infringing behavior by their users. [10] In 2005, MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. was heard by the Supreme Court and is considered by many to be the sequel to the Napster case, addressing ...

  7. Internet censorship in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship_in_the...

    The SAVE Act makes it illegal to knowingly advertise content related to sex trafficking, including online advertising. The law established federal criminal liability for third-party content. One concern was that this would lead companies to over-censor, or to limit the practice of monitoring content altogether to avoid "knowledge" of illegal ...

  8. File sharing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_sharing

    "The File Sharing Act was launched by Chairman Towns in 2009, this act prohibited the use of applications that allowed individuals to share federal information amongst one another. On the other hand, only specific file sharing applications were made available to federal computers" (the United States.Congress.House).

  9. MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MGM_Studios,_Inc._v...

    MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., 545 U.S. 913 (2005), is a United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled unanimously that the defendants, peer-to-peer file sharing companies Grokster and Streamcast (maker of Morpheus), could be held liable for inducing copyright infringement by users of their file sharing software. [1]