Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Here we consider operations over polynomials and n denotes their degree; for the coefficients we use a unit-cost model, ignoring the number of bits in a number. In practice this means that we assume them to be machine integers.
But, we can also compute 1, x 3, x 6, x 12, x 24, x 48, x 96, x 192, x 199, x 398, which saves one multiplication and amounts to evaluating (110 001 110) 2. Here is the general algorithm: Algorithm: Input
5 is halved (2.5) and 6 is doubled (12). The fractional portion is discarded (2.5 becomes 2). The figure in the left column (2) is even, so the figure in the right column (12) is discarded. 2 is halved (1) and 12 is doubled (24). All not-scratched-out values are summed: 3 + 6 + 24 = 33. The method works because multiplication is distributive, so:
For example, to multiply 7 and 15 modulo 17 in Montgomery form, again with R = 100, compute the product of 3 and 4 to get 12 as above. The extended Euclidean algorithm implies that 8⋅100 − 47⋅17 = 1, so R′ = 8. Multiply 12 by 8 to get 96 and reduce modulo 17 to get 11. This is the Montgomery form of 3, as expected.
Note that C99 and C++ do not implement complex numbers in a code-compatible way – the latter instead provides the class std:: complex. All operations on complex numbers are defined in the <complex.h> header. As with the real-valued functions, an f or l suffix denotes the float complex or long double complex variant of the function.
A fixed-point representation of a fractional number is essentially an integer that is to be implicitly multiplied by a fixed scaling factor. For example, the value 1.23 can be stored in a variable as the integer value 1230 with implicit scaling factor of 1/1000 (meaning that the last 3 decimal digits are implicitly assumed to be a decimal fraction), and the value 1 230 000 can be represented ...
Another interesting case on the unit circle is when the sequence () that is being proposed as a multiplier is constant for n in each of the sets {, …, +} and {+ +, …,}. From the Marcinkiewicz multiplier theorem (adapted to the context of the unit circle) we see that any such sequence (also assumed to be bounded, of course) [ clarification ...
This implies that the multiplication is associative, commutative, and that the class of 1 is the unique multiplicative identity. Finally, given a , the multiplicative inverse of a modulo n is an integer x satisfying ax ≡ 1 (mod n ) .