enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Illinois v. Wardlow - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_v._Wardlow

    In an opinion delivered by Chief Justice William Rehnquist, the Supreme Court held in a 5 to 4 decision that the police had reasonable suspicion to justify the stop.The police had reasonable suspicion to justify the stop because nervous, evasive behavior, like fleeing a high crime area upon noticing police officers, is a pertinent factor in determining reasonable suspicion to justify a stop.

  3. Stop and identify statutes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_and_identify_statutes

    Texas law requires a person to provide their name, residence address and date of birth if lawfully arrested and asked by police. (A detained person or witness of a crime is not required to provide any identifying information; however, it is a crime for a detained person or witness to give a false name.) Texas P.C. 38.02

  4. Illinois v. Perkins - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_v._Perkins

    Illinois v. Perkins, 496 U.S. 292 (1990), [1] was a decision by the United States Supreme Court that held that undercover police agents did not need to give Miranda warnings when talking to suspects in jail. [2] Miranda warnings, named after the 1966 Supreme Court case Miranda v.

  5. People can't be detained just for trying to avoid police ...

    www.aol.com/news/people-cant-detained-just...

    Police officers cannot detain someone on the street just because that person acts furtively to avoid contact with them, the California Supreme Court ruled Thursday.

  6. Illinois deputy fired, charged in fatal shooting of Black ...

    www.aol.com/news/illinois-deputy-fired-charged...

    (Reuters) -A former Illinois sheriff's deputy pleaded not guilty to murder on Thursday, according to court documents, one day after he was fired, arrested and charged in the fatal shooting of a 36 ...

  7. Escobedo v. Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escobedo_v._Illinois

    Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964), is a United States Supreme Court case holding that criminal suspects have a right to counsel during police interrogations under the Sixth Amendment. [1] The case was decided a year after the court had held in Gideon v.

  8. Waukesha County court dismisses charge against Brookfield man ...

    www.aol.com/waukesha-county-court-dismisses...

    Braatz, the suspect police intended to pursue Nov. 3, is facing a felony charge for child abuse and intentionally causing harm, according to online court records. Braatz was charged Nov. 6.

  9. SAFE-T Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAFE-T_Act

    The Safety, Accountability, Fairness and Equity-Today Act, commonly known as the SAFE-T Act, is a state of Illinois statute enacted in 2021 that makes a number of reforms to the criminal justice system, affecting policing, pretrial detention and bail, sentencing, and corrections.