enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Supremacy Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supremacy_Clause

    This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

  3. South Carolina v. Katzenbach - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Carolina_v._Katzenbach

    South Carolina v. Katzenbach, 383 U.S. 301 (1966), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court that rejected a challenge from the state of South Carolina to the preclearance provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which required that some states submit changes in election districts to the Attorney General of the United States (at the time, Nicholas Katzenbach). [1]

  4. Judicial review in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_review_in_the...

    The Supremacy Clause of Article VI states: This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the ...

  5. Article Four of the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Four_of_the_United...

    Duryee, 1t1 U.S. (7 Cranch) 481 [permanent dead link ‍] (1813), the United States Supreme Court ruled that the merits of a case, as settled by courts of one state, must be recognized by the courts of other states; state courts may not reopen cases which have been conclusively decided by the courts of another state.

  6. Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Clara_Pueblo_v._Martinez

    Martinez, 436 U.S. 49 (1978), was a landmark case in the area of federal Indian law involving issues of great importance to the meaning of tribal sovereignty in the contemporary United States. The Supreme Court sustained a law passed by the governing body of the Santa Clara Pueblo that explicitly discriminated on the basis of sex. [1]

  7. Adequate and independent state ground - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adequate_and_independent...

    The adequate and independent state ground doctrine states that when a litigant petitions the U.S. Supreme Court to review the judgment of a state court which rests upon both federal and non-federal (state) law, the U.S. Supreme Court does not have jurisdiction over the case if the state ground is (1) “adequate” to support the judgment, and ...

  8. Monopoly on violence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopoly_on_violence

    However, this monopoly is limited to a certain geographical area, and in fact this limitation to a particular area is one of the things that defines a state." [ 2 ] In other words, Weber describes the state as any organization that succeeds in holding the exclusive right to use, threaten, or authorize physical force against residents of its ...

  9. Reynolds v. Sims - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reynolds_v._Sims

    Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the electoral districts of state legislative chambers must be roughly equal in population.