Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A partition of a set S is a set of non-empty, pairwise disjoint subsets of S, called "parts" or "blocks", whose union is all of S.Consider a finite set that is linearly ordered, or (equivalently, for purposes of this definition) arranged in a cyclic order like the vertices of a regular n-gon.
Two disjoint sets. In set theory in mathematics and formal logic, two sets are said to be disjoint sets if they have no element in common. Equivalently, two disjoint sets are sets whose intersection is the empty set. [1] For example, {1, 2, 3} and {4, 5, 6} are disjoint sets, while {1, 2, 3} and {3, 4, 5} are not disjoint. A collection of two ...
The optimization version of the problem, maximum set packing, asks for the maximum number of pairwise disjoint sets in the list. It is a maximization problem that can be formulated naturally as an integer linear program , belonging to the class of packing problems .
In combinatorics, a laminar set family is a set family in which each pair of sets are either disjoint or related by containment. [1] [2] Formally, a set family {S 1, S 2, ...} is called laminar if for every i, j, the intersection of S i and S j is either empty, or equals S i, or equals S j. Let E be a ground-set of elements.
In mathematics, the disjoint union (or discriminated union) of the sets A and B is the set formed from the elements of A and B labelled (indexed) with the name of the set from which they come. So, an element belonging to both A and B appears twice in the disjoint union, with two different labels.
In the case where P is ordered by inclusion, and closed under subsets, but does not contain the empty set, this is simply a family of pairwise disjoint sets. A strong upwards antichain B is a subset of P in which no two distinct elements have a common upper bound in P. Authors will often omit the "upwards" and "downwards" term and merely refer ...
In this formula, the summation in the middle is the general form used to define the exponential generating function for any sequence of numbers, and the formula on the right is the result of performing the summation in the specific case of the Bell numbers.
Then consider ,, …, to be a maximal collection of pairwise disjoint sets (that is, is the empty set unless =, and every set in intersects with some ). Because we assumed that W {\displaystyle W} had no sunflower of size r {\displaystyle r} , and a collection of pairwise disjoint sets is a sunflower, t < r {\displaystyle t<r} .