Ads
related to: john gospel biblechristianbook.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
Easy online order; very reasonable; lots of product variety - BizRate
mardel.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Gospel of John, like all the gospels, is anonymous. [14] John 21:22 [15] references a disciple whom Jesus loved and John 21:24–25 [16] says: "This is the disciple who is testifying to these things and has written them, and we know that his testimony is true". [11]
Media related to Gospel of John - Chapter 1 at Wikimedia Commons; Works related to John Chapter 1 at Wikisource; John 1 King James Bible - Wikisource; English Translation with Parallel Latin Vulgate; Online Bible at GospelHall.org (ESV, KJV, Darby, American Standard Version, Bible in Basic English) Multiple bible versions at Bible Gateway (NKJV ...
John the Evangelist [a] (c. 6 AD – c. 100 AD) is the name traditionally given to the author of the Gospel of John.Christians have traditionally identified him with John the Apostle, John of Patmos, and John the Presbyter, [2] although there is no consensus on how many of these may actually be the same individual.
Modern, mainstream Bible scholars generally assert that the Gospel of John has been written by an anonymous author. [65] [66] [67] Regarding whether the author of the Gospel of John was an eyewitness, according to Paul N. Anderson, the gospel "contains more direct claims to eyewitness origins than any of the other Gospel traditions."
In Christian scholarship, the Book of Signs is a name commonly given to the first main section of the Gospel of John, from 1:19 to the end of Chapter 12. It follows the Hymn to the Word and precedes the Book of Glory. It is named for seven notable events, often called "signs" or "miracles", that it records. [1]
The gospel was not widely quoted until late in the 2nd century. [25] Justin Martyr is probably the first Church Father to quote the Gospel of John. [26] Some scholars conclude that in antiquity John was probably considered less important than the synoptics. [27]