enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Rucho v. Common Cause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rucho_v._Common_Cause

    Rucho v. Common Cause, No. 18-422, 588 U.S. 684 (2019) is a landmark case of the United States Supreme Court concerning partisan gerrymandering. [1] The Court ruled that while partisan gerrymandering may be "incompatible with democratic principles", the federal courts cannot review such allegations, as they present nonjusticiable political questions outside the jurisdiction of these courts.

  3. Gill v. Whitford - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gill_v._Whitford

    Gill v. Whitford, 585 U.S. 48 (2018), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the constitutionality of partisan gerrymandering.Other forms of gerrymandering based on racial or ethnic grounds had been deemed unconstitutional, and while the Supreme Court had identified that extreme partisan gerrymandering could also be unconstitutional, the Court had not agreed on how this could be ...

  4. Gerrymandering in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerrymandering_in_the...

    The Supreme Court revisited the concept of partisan gerrymandering claims in Vieth v. Jubelirer (2004). [28] While the Court upheld that partisan gerrymandering could be justiciable, the justices were divided in this specific case as no clear standard against which to evaluate partisan gerrymandering claims emerged.

  5. Gerrymandering Isn't New—But Now We Have a Solution

    www.aol.com/gerrymandering-isnt-now-solution...

    Common Cause, in which the majority determined that the federal courts cannot adjudicate partisan gerrymandering, “Election Day . . . is the foundation of democratic governance. And partisan ...

  6. Political question - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_question

    Lamone (2017) were decided without taking a final stance on partisan gerrymandering. [20] Rucho v. Common Cause and Lamone v. Benisek (2019) were decided together on June 27, 2019, where a 5-4 majority concluded partisan gerrymandering was a political question and nonjusticiable by federal courts.

  7. Vieth v. Jubelirer - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vieth_v._Jubelirer

    Bandemer", which had found the issue of partisan gerrymandering within the judiciary's remit: five justices were unwilling to determine that partisan gerrymandering claims were nonjusticiable, instead simply not coming to a clear criteria. In contrast, the District Court's ruling in this case require, according to Smith, factual showings of ...

  8. Supreme Court hears NC case on elections, with big ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-hearing-nc-case...

    A key argument Republican lawmakers have made in this case is that the N.C. Supreme Court overstepped its bounds by throwing out the legislature’s maps as unconstitutional gerrymandering based ...

  9. Ohio Issue 1: What is it, who is for it, and who is against it?

    www.aol.com/ohio-issue-1-against-035900672.html

    Yard signs for Issue 1 read "Ban gerrymandering" while those against Issue 1 read "Stop gerrymandering." The early voting window closes on Sunday, November 3. Election Day is Tuesday, November 5.