enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Gleason grading system - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gleason_grading_system

    For example, if the primary tumor grade was 2 and the secondary tumor grade was 3 but some cells were found to be grade 4, the Gleason score would be 2+4=6. This is a slight change from the pre-2005 Gleason system where the second number was the secondary grade (i.e., the grade of the second-most common cell line pattern). [4]

  3. Prostate cancer staging - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostate_cancer_staging

    Of note, this system of describing tumors as "well-", "moderately-", and "poorly-" differentiated based on Gleason score of 2–4, 5–6, and 7–10, respectively, persists in SEER and other databases but is generally outdated. In recent years pathologists rarely assign a tumor a grade less than 3, particularly in biopsy tissue. [citation needed]

  4. AECOM - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AECOM

    The company's official name from 1990–2015 was AECOM Technology Corporation, and is now AECOM. [2] The company is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the ticker symbol ACM and on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol E6Z. [3] AECOM has approximately 51,000 employees, and is number 291 on the 2023 Fortune 500 list ...

  5. Talk:Prostate cancer staging - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Prostate_cancer_staging

    [4] 5) Clarify “risk” based on Gleason scale. Add: "A Gleason score of 6 is considered low risk and 3+4=7 is intermediate risk. Both 4+3=7 and 8-10 are considered high risk." [5] 6) Make Gleason Grade consistent throughout. i.e., In the article, it mentions G score, cancer grade, histologic grade, etc. We suggest replacing those with ...

  6. Talk:Gleason grading system - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Gleason_Grading_System

    In contrast to the original Gleason grading system, it is now recommended that on a needle core biopsy both the most common and highest grade are added together for the Gleason score [2]. For example, if there is 60 % Gleason pattern 3, 35 % Gleason pattern 4, and 5 % Gleason pattern 5, the Gleason score would be 3 + 5 = 8.

  7. Donald Gleason - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Gleason

    Gleason's technique, which he published in the journal Cancer Chemotherapy Reports in 1966, focused on two details of the architecture of the cancer cells, and assigned a score of one to five to each attribute. Thus, any given patient could have a score of between two and ten——the higher the score, the more aggressive the cancer, and the ...

  8. DuPont analysis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DuPont_analysis

    The ROE of such firms may be particularly dependent on performance of this metric, and hence asset turnover may be studied extremely carefully for signs of under-, or, over-performance. For example, same-store sales of many retailers is considered important as an indication that the firm is deriving greater profits from existing stores (rather ...

  9. 68–95–99.7 rule - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/68–95–99.7_rule

    In the empirical sciences, the so-called three-sigma rule of thumb (or 3 σ rule) expresses a conventional heuristic that nearly all values are taken to lie within three standard deviations of the mean, and thus it is empirically useful to treat 99.7% probability as near certainty.