Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Good moral character is an ideal state of a person's beliefs and values that is considered most beneficial to society. [1] [2]In United States law, good moral character can be assessed through the requirement of virtuous acts or by principally evaluating negative conduct.
Honesty or truthfulness is a facet of moral character that connotes positive and virtuous attributes such as integrity, truthfulness, straightforwardness (including straightforwardness of conduct: earnestness), along with the absence of lying, cheating, theft, etc. Honesty also involves being trustworthy, loyal, fair, and sincere.
This essay is, in my opinion, focused on how honesty relates to being a good Wikipedian, so I don't agree with the objections presented by Picaroon. Friday (talk) I mean that every time someone, accidentally or on purpose, goes against the commandmants set forth in this essay, they'll be accused of being dishonest.
Chelsea boss Enzo Maresca says honesty is the key to keeping a large squad harmonious as competition for first team places is so fierce. Nicolas Jackson has been the preferred starting striker in ...
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us
Intellectual honesty is an applied method of problem solving characterised by a nonpartisan and honest attitude, which can be demonstrated in a number of different ways: One's personal beliefs or politics do not interfere with the pursuit of truth;
About essays – what essays are, the types of essays and status within the community. Avoid writing redundant essays – why it is a good idea to check if similar essays already exist before creating new ones. Difference between policies, guidelines and essays – what the community chooses to call a "policy" or a "guideline" or an "essay".
In this essay, arguing against the position of Benjamin Constant, Des réactions politiques, Kant states that: [2]. Hence a lie defined merely as an intentionally untruthful declaration to another man does not require the additional condition that it must do harm to another, as jurists require in their definition (mendacium est falsiloquium in praeiudicium alterius).