enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Sylvia Mendez - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sylvia_Mendez

    Westminster case, the landmark desegregation case of 1946. The case successfully ended de jure segregation in California [1] and paved the way for integration and the American civil rights movement. [2] Mendez grew up during a time when most southern and southwestern schools were segregated. In the case of California, Hispanics were not allowed ...

  3. Mendez v. Westminster - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mendez_v._Westminster

    Although the case was a victory for the families affected, it was narrowly focused on the small number of Mexican remedial schools in question and did not challenge legal race segregation in California or elsewhere. After Mendez, racial minorities were still subject to legal segregation in schools and public places.

  4. Racial segregation in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_segregation_in_the...

    Segregation was enforced across the U.S. for much of its history. Racial segregation follows two forms, De jure and De facto. De jure segregation mandated the separation of races by law, and was the form imposed by slave codes before the Civil War and by Black Codes and Jim Crow laws following the war.

  5. Delgado v. Bastrop ISD - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delgado_v._Bastrop_ISD

    Previously in 1930, one court case, Del Rio I.S.D V Salvatierra, had attempted to fight against this segregation, but had failed. [3] Then in 1946, two years previous to the Bastrop case, the judge in Mendez v. Westminster ruled against the segregation of Mexican-American children in public schools. [6]

  6. Lopez v. Seccombe - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lopez_v._Seccombe

    Lopez v. Seccombe. 71 F. Supp. 769. 1, US District Court for the Southern District of California, 1944, was a 1944 court case within the city and county of San Bernardino about whether Mexican Americans were able to use the city's public pool at any time despite the cities restricted limits.

  7. Smith v. Allwright - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_v._Allwright

    Smith v. Allwright, 321 U.S. 649 (1944), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court with regard to voting rights and, by extension, racial desegregation.It overturned the Texas state law that authorized parties to set their internal rules, including the use of white primaries.

  8. List of landmark court decisions in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 (1940) The states cannot interfere with the free exercise of religion. Minersville School District v. Gobitis, 310 U.S. 586 (1940) The First Amendment does not require public schools to excuse students from saluting the American flag and reciting the Pledge of Allegiance on religious grounds.

  9. Hedgepeth and Williams v. Board of Education - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedgepeth_and_Williams_v...

    Board of Education, Trenton, NJ, 131 N.J.L. 153, 35 A.2d 622 (1944), also known as the Hedgepeth–Williams case, was a landmark New Jersey Supreme Court decision decided in 1944. The Court ruled that since racial segregation was outlawed by the New Jersey State Constitution, it was unlawful for schools to segregate or refuse admission to ...