enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Whistleblower protection in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whistleblower_protection...

    The US Supreme Court has limited whistleblower protections for public disclosures based on free speech for most government workers. Garcetti v. Ceballos held that the First Amendment does not apply to situations that fall within the scope of the job description associated with the employment of each government worker. The Supreme Court decision ...

  3. Garcetti v. Ceballos - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garcetti_v._Ceballos

    Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), is a U.S. Supreme Court decision involving First Amendment free speech protections for government employees. The plaintiff in the case was a district attorney who claimed that he had been passed up for a promotion for criticizing the legitimacy of a warrant.

  4. Murray v. UBS Securities, LLC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murray_v._UBS_Securities,_LLC

    On January 13, 2023, Murray petitioned the Supreme Court to hear his case. On May 1, 2023, the Court granted certiorari. Oral argument was held on October 10, 2023. On February 8, 2024, Justice Sotomayor delivered a unanimous opinion, siding with Murray. The justices held that with the protections of SOX, a whistleblower does not have to prove ...

  5. Column: A Trump judge just overturned the government's most ...

    www.aol.com/news/column-trump-judge-just...

    Since 1986, whistleblowers have been in the forefront of the government's war on fraud, accounting for $53 billion, or more than 70%, of the $75 billion recovered from swindlers on defense ...

  6. Lane v. Franks - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lane_v._Franks

    Lane v. Franks, 573 U.S. 228 (2014), is a U.S. Supreme Court case involving public employee's freedom of speech rights. Edward Lane sued Steve Franks for unfairly firing him, out of retaliation for sworn testimony Lane gave during a federal fraud case. [1]

  7. Whistleblowers: Texas Supreme Court must reject Ken ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/whistleblowers-texas-supreme-court...

    Responding to Paxton's motion to the Supreme Court on Thursday, attorneys for the whistleblowers laid out a litany of arguments to derail what they said was Paxton's "repugnant ploy" to keep ...

  8. Ken Paxton can’t be deposed under oath in whistleblower ...

    www.aol.com/ken-paxton-t-deposed-under-183606233...

    Attorney General Ken Paxton will not have to sit for a deposition in a longstanding lawsuit filed by four former senior aides who said he improperly fired them after they reported him to the FBI ...

  9. Whistleblower Protection Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whistleblower_Protection_Act

    The Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989, 5 U.S.C. 2302(b)(8)-(9), Pub.L. 101-12 as amended, is a United States federal law that protects federal whistleblowers who work for the government and report the possible existence of an activity constituting a violation of law, rules, or regulations, or mismanagement, gross waste of funds, abuse of authority or a substantial and specific danger to ...