Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The journal was established in 1945 as the official journal of the Belgian Rheumatology Society and carried different titles before obtaining its current title in 1982. According to the Journal Citation Reports , the journal has a 2020 impact factor of 2.980.
Journals with high impact factors from major publishers tend to have the highest APCs. [ 1 ] Open access articles often have a surcharge compared to closed-access or paywalled content; for example, the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences charges $1590–$4215 per article (depending on length) for closed-access, with a surcharge of ...
Does not accept clinical research articles that have been shared as preprints. Does not accept clinical research articles that have been shared as preprints. Does not accept clinical research articles that have been shared as preprints. [24] British Medical Journal Company: Not-for-profit servers (e.g. arXiv, bioRxiv, chemRxiv, medRxiv ...
Journal of Clinical Rheumatology is a peer reviewed and indexed medical journal in the field of clinical rheumatology, published by PANLAR, Panamerican League of Associations for Rheumatology. [ 1 ] References
Pages for logged out editors learn more. Contributions; Talk; JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology
The journal was established in 2006 by Future Medicine under the title Future Rheumatology. It became International Journal of Clinical Rheumatology in 2009 and is now published by Open Access Journals , an imprint of the Pulsus Group , which is on Jeffrey Beall 's list of "Potential, possible, or probable" predatory open-access publishers ...
Best Practice & Research: Clinical Rheumatology is a medical journal covering evidence-based medicine as applied to clinical practice of musculoskeletal conditions. It is aimed at clinical physicians and trainees, to help them keep up to date with current practice. Issues contain review articles with a practical bent. [1]
Incorrect assignment of authorship occasionally leads to charges of academic misconduct and sanctions for the violator. A 2002 survey of a large sample of researchers who had received funding from the U.S. National Institutes of Health revealed that 10% of respondents claimed to have inappropriately assigned authorship credit within the last ...