enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Brady v. Maryland - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brady_v._Maryland

    Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that under the Due Process Clause of the Constitution of the United States, the prosecution must turn over to a criminal defendant any significant evidence in its possession that suggests the defendant is not guilty (exculpatory evidence).

  3. Investigator in Hialeah cop beating case wants state ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/investigator-hialeah-cop-beating...

    For the past two years the city of Hialeah and state prosecutors have withheld, illegally redacted and in some cases, denied the existence of hundreds of public records requested by a private ...

  4. Prosecutorial misconduct - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosecutorial_misconduct

    During that period, judges have cited misconduct by prosecutors as a reason to dismiss charges, reverse convictions, or reduce sentences in 2,012 cases, according to a study by the Center for Public Integrity released in 2003; the researchers looked at 11,452 cases in which misconduct was alleged. [7] A debate persists over the meaning of the term.

  5. Prosecutors’ missteps lead to tossed life sentence for Miami ...

    www.aol.com/prosecutors-missteps-lead-tossed...

    The new sentence for Taji Pearson, the wheel man in the fatal, 2010 shooting of 15-year-old Sabrina O’Neil, followed the discovery of evidence withheld for years from the defense.

  6. Opinion - When prosecutors ‘take a dive’ — the purported ...

    www.aol.com/opinion-prosecutors-dive-purported...

    The prosecutors never withheld evidence. The case’s true lesson is about the emerging dangers of prosecutors confessing phantom “errors,” and sometimes even throwing cases on purpose.

  7. United States v. Bagley - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Bagley

    Maryland, the Supreme Court held that the prosecution must disclose all exculpatory evidence to the defense. The only requirements being that the evidence is favorable to the defendant and material. [1]: 4 Thirteen years later, the Supreme Court defined what it meant for evidence to be material in a case called United States v

  8. United States v. Williams (1992) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Williams...

    United States v. Williams, 504 U.S. 36 (1992), was a U.S. Supreme Court case concerning the presentation of exculpatory evidence to a grand jury.It ruled that the federal courts do not have the supervisory power to require prosecutors to present exculpatory evidence to the grand jury.

  9. Former special prosecutor says she quit over withheld evidence

    www.aol.com/former-special-prosecutor-says-she...

    Jul. 13—Erlinda Ocampo Johnson was second chair on the prosecution team for the involuntary manslaughter case against actor and producer Alec Baldwin. But she became a main character in the ...