enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. R v B (KG) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_B_(KG)

    Chief Justice Antonio Lamer, writing for the majority, held that the statements were admissible. He allowed the appeal and ordered a new trial. The principled exception to hearsay, as outlined in R v Khan and R v Smith, requires that the statement be reliable and necessary. Lamer CJ adopted these two criteria in formulating the test for ...

  3. Davis v. Washington - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davis_v._Washington

    Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813 (2006), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States and written by Justice Antonin Scalia that established the test used to determine whether a hearsay statement is "testimonial" for Confrontation Clause purposes. Two years prior to its publication, in Crawford v.

  4. Standard of review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_of_review

    Additionally, in some areas of substantive law, such as when a court is reviewing a First Amendment issue, an appellate court will use a standard of review called "independent review." [citation needed] The standard is somewhere in between de novo review and clearly erroneous review. Under independent review, an appellate court will reexamine ...

  5. Confrontation Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confrontation_Clause

    In 2004, in Crawford v.Washington, the Supreme Court of the United States significantly redefined the application of the Sixth Amendment's right to confrontation. In Crawford, the Supreme Court changed the inquiry from whether the evidence offered had an "indicia of reliability" to whether the evidence is testimonial hearsay. [3]

  6. R v W (D) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_W_(D)

    Justice Cory, for the majority, denied the appeal.. In considering the recharge, he found that the judge erred. It is incorrect to instruct a jury in a criminal case that, in order to render a verdict, they must decide whether they believe the defence evidence or the Crown's evidence. Putting this either/or proposition to the jury excludes the third alternative; namely, that the jury, without ...

  7. Summary judgment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summary_judgment

    In law, a summary judgment, also referred to as judgment as a matter of law or summary disposition, [1] is a judgment entered by a court for one party and against another party summarily, i.e., without a full trial. Summary judgments may be issued on the merits of an entire case, or on discrete issues in that case.

  8. ACC basketball has a credibility gap, created in part by its ...

    www.aol.com/acc-basketball-credibility-gap...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  9. Appellate procedure in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appellate_procedure_in_the...

    In different jurisdictions, appellate courts are also called appeals courts, courts of appeals, superior courts, or supreme courts. The specific procedures for appealing, including even whether there is a right of appeal from a particular type of decision, can vary greatly from state to state.