Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
All believers are living, breathing testimonies to the life-changing power of God. All believers are examples of His “workmanship.”
Other references to the concept include Ephesians 2:10, "For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them." [1] The old, Adamic creation could not be said to be in any sense "in Christ," so this must therefore be speaking of new creation. [citation needed]
Wesley gave the analogy of a house. He said repentance is the porch. Faith is the door. But holy living is the house itself. Holy living is true religion. "Salvation is like a house. To get into the house you first have to get on the porch (repentance) and then you have to go through the door (faith).
The labor theory of property, also called the labor theory of appropriation, labor theory of ownership, labor theory of entitlement, and principle of first appropriation, is a theory of natural law that holds that property originally comes about by the exertion of labor upon natural resources.
Lincoln had an attraction to machinelike accessories all his life, which some say was hereditary and handed down to him from his father's interest in labor-saving equipment. He made speeches on inventions before he became president. He said in 1858, "Man is not the only animal who labors; but he is the only one who improves his workmanship." [1 ...
Pride of workmanship is the gratifying sense of having done good work. It is an element of job satisfaction. One of the key principles in the philosophy of management consultant W. Edwards Deming is that workers have a right to pride of workmanship: Remove barriers that rob the hourly worker of his right to pride of workmanship.
Dick Van Dyke is reflecting on his lucky escape from the Malibu, Calif., wildfires. The screen legend, who turns 99 on Friday, Dec. 13., told a local news outlet that his neighbors “saved” him.
And once you ask who created God, you are falling into a regress absurdum. [3] John Humphreys writes: ... if someone were able to provide the explanation, we would be forced to embark upon what philosophers call an infinite regress. Having established who created God, we would then have to answer the question of who created God's creator. [4]