Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
United States of America v. Microsoft Corporation , 253 F.3d 34 (D.C. Cir. 2001), was a landmark American antitrust law case at the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit .
The Supreme Court of the United States handed down sixteen per curiam opinions during its 2017 term, which began October 2, 2017, and concluded September 30, 2018. [1] Because per curiam decisions are issued from the Court as an institution, these opinions all lack the attribution of authorship or joining votes to specific justices. All ...
Microsoft Corp. v. United States, known on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court as United States v. Microsoft Corp., 584 U.S. ___, 138 S. Ct. 1186 (2018), was a data privacy case involving the extraterritoriality of law enforcement seeking electronic data under the 1986 Stored Communications Act (SCA), Title II of the Electronic Communications ...
Costello v. United States, 390 U.S. 201 (1968) (per curiam) Piccioli v. United States, 390 U.S. 202 (1968) (per curiam) Forgett v. United States, 390 U.S. 203 (1968) (per curiam) Ortega v. Michigan, 390 U.S. 204 (1968) (per curiam) Stone v. United States, 390 U.S. 204 (1968) (per curiam) Anderson v. Georgia, 390 U.S. 206 (1968) (per curiam) SEC ...
0–9. 1999 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States; 2000 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States
It parodies the then-upcoming Windows 98 operating system, as well as Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates. [5] [6] Released by Palladium Interactive during the United States v. Microsoft Corp. case and at a time when Microsoft, Windows, and Gates were easy targets for jokes, the game attempted to offer a satirical take on the subject matter.
The case is New York Times Co v Microsoft Corp et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 23-11195. (Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama ...
The Supreme Court of the United States handed down nine per curiam opinions during its 2001 term, which began October 1, 2001, and concluded October 6, 2002. [1] Because per curiam decisions are issued from the Court as an institution, these opinions all lack the attribution of authorship or joining votes to specific justices. All justices on ...