enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Employment Division v. Smith - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employment_Division_v._Smith

    Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990), is a United States Supreme Court case that held that the state could deny unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state prohibition on the use of peyote even though the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual.

  3. Fact-check: Has the Supreme Court ever taken away a ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/fact-check-supreme-court-ever...

    A second instance multiple scholars referenced was the 1990 case Employment Division v. Smith, which found that the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause did not contain the right to religious ...

  4. David B. Frohnmayer - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_B._Frohnmayer

    Frohnmayer prevailed in six out of the seven cases that he took to the United States Supreme Court: [5] Oregon v. Kennedy (1982), Oregon v. Bradshaw (1983), Oregon v. Elstad (1985), Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife v. Klamath Indian Tribe (1985), Whitley v. Albers (1986), and Employment Division v. Smith (1990). [5] His one unsuccessful ...

  5. Sohappy v. Smith - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sohappy_v._Smith

    Sohappy v. Smith, 302 F. Supp. 899 (D. Or. 1969), [1] was a federal case heard by the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, decided in 1969 and amended in 1975. It began with fourteen members of the Yakama who sued the U.S. state of Oregon over its fishing regulations.

  6. Supreme Court decision guide: Takeaways from the Trump ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-decision-guide...

    Case:City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. Johnson. Decided: June 28, 2024. Case argued: April 22, 2024. ... But since the Supreme Court tossed the case, prescriptions will still be allowed during the ...

  7. Adkins v. Children's Hospital - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adkins_v._Children's_Hospital

    The Court's decision, by Justice Sutherland, was that previous decisions (Muller v. Oregon, 208 U.S. 412 (1908) and Bunting v. Oregon, 243 U.S. 426 (1917)) did not overrule the holding in Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905), which protected freedom of contract. The previous decisions, he noted, addressed maximum hours.

  8. Fuller v. Oregon - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuller_v._Oregon

    Fuller v. Oregon, 417 U.S. 40 (1974), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Oregon's statute allowing for the recoupment of costs related to court-appointed defense counsel did not violate either the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause or the Sixth Amendment's Assistance of Counsel Clause.

  9. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!