Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
There exists a few papers that systematically compare various model checkers on a common case study. The comparison usually discusses the modelling tradeoffs faced when using the input languages of each model checker, as well as the comparison of performances of the tools when verifying correctness properties. One can mention:
The Berkeley Lazy Abstraction Software verification Tool (BLAST) is a software model checking tool for C programs.The task addressed by BLAST is the need to check whether software satisfies the behavioral requirements of its associated interfaces.
Afra: a model checker for Rebeca which is an actor-based language for modeling concurrent and reactive systems; Alloy (Alloy Analyzer) BLAST (Berkeley Lazy Abstraction Software Verification Tool) CADP (Construction and Analysis of Distributed Processes) a toolbox for the design of communication protocols and distributed systems
In the context of computer science, the C Bounded Model Checker (CBMC) is a bounded model checker for C programs. [1] It was the first such tool. [2] CBMC has participated in the Competition on Software Verification (SV-COMP) in the years 2014–2022. [3] It came in first in at least one category in 2014, 2015, and 2017.
In 2010, DRDO's ARDE lab and OFB collaborated to iron out the problems with the MSMC design. [12] The redesigned MSMC was now redesignated as Joint Venture Protective Carbine or JVPC. The prototypes of JVPC was offered to the Army for user trials in 2013. [13] Also in this time period an exigency for a carbine has arisen. [7]
SPIN is a general tool for verifying the correctness of concurrent software models in a rigorous and mostly automated fashion. It was written by Gerard J. Holzmann and others in the original Unix group of the Computing Sciences Research Center at Bell Labs, beginning in 1980.
AOL Mail welcomes Verizon customers to our safe and delightful email experience!
FDR is often described as a model checker, but is technically a refinement checker, in that it converts two CSP process expressions into Labelled Transition Systems (LTSs), and then determines whether one of the processes is a refinement of the other within some specified semantic model (traces, failures, failures/divergence and some other ...