enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Students_for_Fair...

    The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Bakke, a 1978 landmark decision, that affirmative action could be used as a determining factor in college admission policy but that the University of California, Davis School of Medicine's racial quota was discriminatory. The Court upheld this case in Grutter v. Bollinger, a 2003 landmark decision.

  3. California Supreme Court Historical Society - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Supreme_Court...

    The California Supreme Court Historical Society (CSCHS) describes itself as "a non-profit public benefit corporation dedicated to recovering, preserving, and promoting California’s legal and judicial history, with a particular emphasis on the State’s highest court." [1] It is chaired by Patricia Guerrero, the chief justice of California. [2]

  4. What the Supreme Court's ruling on affirmative action means ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-courts-ruling...

    The Supreme Court decided two cases brought by Students for Fair Admissions, a group headed by Edward Blum, a conservative legal strategist who has spent years fighting affirmative action.

  5. Supreme Court of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_California

    The California Supreme Court and all lower California state courts use a different writing style and citation system from the federal courts and many other state courts. California citations have the year between the names of the parties and the reference to the case reporter, as opposed to the national standard (the Bluebook ) of putting the ...

  6. Grutter v. Bollinger - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grutter_v._Bollinger

    Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003), was a landmark case of the Supreme Court of the United States concerning affirmative action in student admissions.The Court held that a student admissions process that favors "underrepresented minority groups" did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause so long as it took into account other factors evaluated on an individual ...

  7. Affirmative action - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirmative_action

    Affirmative action was extended to sex by Executive Order 11375 which amended Executive Order 11246 on 13 October 1967, by adding "sex" to the list of protected categories. In the U.S. affirmative action's original purpose was to pressure institutions into compliance with the nondiscrimination mandate of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

  8. California Supreme Court to rule on high-stakes battle over ...

    www.aol.com/news/california-supreme-court-rule...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  9. Public employees cannot use labor law to sue employers ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/controversial-labor-law-doesnt...

    The California Supreme Court ruling curtails the ability of public employees in the state to seek help from the courts in labor disputes.

  1. Related searches when did 1445 start writing act 7 of california supreme court decision on affirmative action

    california supreme court case lawaffirmative action unconstitutional