enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Historicity of Jesus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus

    Scholars argue that the surviving gospels show usage of earlier independent written and oral sources that extended back to the time of Jesus's death, but did not survive. [note 13] [note 14] [note 21] Aramaic sources have been detected in Mark's Gospel, which could indicate use of early or even eyewitness testimony when it was being written.

  3. Sources for the historicity of Jesus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sources_for_the...

    [156] 1 Thessalonians 2:15 places the responsibility for the death of Jesus on some Jews. [7] [159] Moreover, the statement in 1 Thessalonians 2:14–16 about the Jews "who both killed the Lord Jesus" and "drove out us" indicates that the death of Jesus was within the same time frame as the persecution of Paul. [167]

  4. Tacitus on Jesus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacitus_on_Jesus

    Biblical scholar Bart D. Ehrman wrote: "Tacitus's report confirms what we know from other sources, that Jesus was executed by order of the Roman governor of Judea, Pontius Pilate, sometime during Tiberius's reign." [66] However, some scholars question the value of the passage given that Tacitus was born 25 years after Jesus' death. [57]

  5. Talk:Jesus/Dates of Birth and Death - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Jesus/Dates_of_Birth...

    "If we remember the prevailing tradition represented by the majority of the early Christian scholars dated the birth of Jesus in 3/2 B.C., and if we accept the time of Herod's death as between the [lunar] eclipse of Jan 9/10 and the Passover of April 8 in the year 1 B.C., then we will probably date the nativity of Jesus in 3/2 B.C., perhaps in mid-January in 2 B.C." p. 319, §549.

  6. Historical Jesus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_Jesus

    Virtually all scholars of antiquity agree that Jesus existed. [8] [9] [31] Historian Michael Grant asserts that if conventional standards of historical criticism are applied to the New Testament, "we can no more reject Jesus' existence than we can reject the existence of a mass of pagan personages whose reality as historical figures is never questioned."

  7. Scholarly interpretation of Gospel elements - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholarly_interpretation...

    Per the Bible, Jesus grew up in Galilee and much of his ministry took place there. [29] The language spoken in Galilee and Judea during the 1st century amongst the common people was most frequently the Semitic Aramaic tongue, [30] [31] [32] and most scholars support the theory that Jesus spoke Aramaic, although he may have also spoken Hebrew and perhaps had some fluency in Greek.

  8. Date of the birth of Jesus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Date_of_the_birth_of_Jesus

    The nativity accounts in the New Testament gospels of Matthew and Luke do not mention a date or time of year for the birth of Jesus. [a] Karl Rahner states that the authors of the gospels generally focused on theological elements rather than historical chronologies. [6] Both Luke and Matthew associate Jesus' birth with the time of Herod the ...

  9. Harrowing of Hell - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harrowing_of_Hell

    The Catechism of the Catholic Church states: "By the expression 'He descended into Hell', the Apostles' Creed confesses that Jesus did really die and through his death for us conquered death and the devil 'who has the power of death' (Hebrews 2:14). In his human soul united to his divine person, the dead Christ went down to the realm of the dead.