enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. 'Use common sense': Burning not advised in Wayne County ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/common-sense-burning-not-advised...

    A 10-acre woodland fire was reported in Wayne County. Burning is not advised.

  3. Fire report: Burn barrel triggers wildfire near Ephrata - AOL

    www.aol.com/fire-report-burn-barrel-triggers...

    May 21—EPHRATA — A 10-acre wildfire started Monday evening after an unsupervised burn barrel spread to nearby vegetation in the area of Naylor Junction, southwest of Ephrata, according to a ...

  4. When are outdoor burn bans issued? What to know as ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/outdoor-burn-bans-issued-know...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  5. Ephrata Township, Pennsylvania - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephrata_Township,_Pennsylvania

    Ephrata Township is a township in northeastern Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, United States. The population was 10,391 at the 2020 census. [2] History.

  6. Burn ban in effect for county - AOL

    www.aol.com/burn-ban-effect-county-222100532.html

    Sep. 18—Staff report The lack of rain this summer has led to drought conditions in southern Ohio and now Lawrence County is among 27 counties where opening burn is now banned. State Fire Marshal ...

  7. Rothsville, Pennsylvania - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothsville,_Pennsylvania

    Rothsville is located in northern Lancaster County, in the eastern part of Warwick Township. Pennsylvania Route 772 is the community's Main Street; the highway leads west 3 miles (5 km) to Lititz and southeast 2.5 miles (4.0 km) to U.S. Route 222 in Brownstown.

  8. Ephrata man burns apartment, holes up in bathroom

    www.aol.com/ephrata-man-burns-apartment-holes...

    Nov. 13—EPHRATA — A man was arrested Sunday after setting an apartment on fire and then barricading himself in the bathroom, according to a statement from the Ephrata Police Department.

  9. Virginia v. Black - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_v._Black

    Virginia v. Black, 538 U.S. 343 (2003), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 5–4, that any state statute banning cross burning on the basis that it constitutes prima facie evidence of intent to intimidate is a violation of the First Amendment to the Constitution.