Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In practice the odds ratio is commonly used for case-control studies, as the relative risk cannot be estimated. [1] In fact, the odds ratio has much more common use in statistics, since logistic regression, often associated with clinical trials, works with the log of the odds ratio, not relative risk. Because the (natural log of the) odds of a ...
The group exposed to treatment (left) has the risk of an adverse outcome (black) reduced by 50% (RRR = 0.5) compared to the unexposed group (right). In epidemiology , the relative risk reduction (RRR) or efficacy is the relative decrease in the risk of an adverse event in the exposed group compared to an unexposed group.
It is defined as the inverse of the absolute risk increase, and computed as / (), where is the incidence in the treated (exposed) group, and is the incidence in the control (unexposed) group. [1] Intuitively, the lower the number needed to harm, the worse the risk factor, with 1 meaning that every exposed person is harmed.
Multiple synonyms of AF e are in use: attributable fraction, [1] [3] relative attributable risk, [1] attributable proportion among the exposed, [1] and attributable risk among the exposed. [4] Similarly, attributable risk percent (ARP) is used as a synonym for the attributable risk percent among the exposed. [3]
By relative risk: Quotient of risk among exposed and risk among unexposed: Pre-test probability multiplied by the relative risk: Low, unless subsequent relative risks are derived from same multivariate regression analysis: Relatively intuitive to use: By diagnostic criteria and clinical prediction rules: Variable, but usually most tedious: Variable
and = / / = While the prevalence is only 9% (9/100), the odds ratio (OR) is equal to 11.3 and the relative risk (RR) is equal to 7.2. Despite fulfilling the rare disease assumption overall, the OR and RR can hardly be considered to be approximately the same. However, the prevalence in the exposed group is 40%, which means is not sufficiently small
While the median endpoint ratio is a relative speed measure, the hazard ratio is not. [3] The relationship between treatment effect and the hazard ratio is given as . A statistically important, but practically insignificant effect can produce a large hazard ratio, e.g. a treatment increasing the number of one-year survivors in a population from ...
This value is very useful in determining the therapeutic benefit or risk to patients in experimental groups, in comparison to patients in placebo or traditionally treated control groups. [citation needed] Three statistical terms rely on EER for their calculation: absolute risk reduction, relative risk reduction and number needed to treat.