Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The longest alternating subsequence problem has also been studied in the setting of online algorithms, in which the elements of are presented in an online fashion, and a decision maker needs to decide whether to include or exclude each element at the time it is first presented, without any knowledge of the elements that will be presented in the future, and without the possibility of recalling ...
For LCS(R 2, C 3), A does not match C. LCS(R 2, C 2) contains sequences (A) and (G); LCS(R 1, C 3) is (G), which is already contained in LCS(R 2, C 2). The result is that LCS(R 2, C 3) also contains the two subsequences, (A) and (G). For LCS(R 2, C 4), A matches A, which is appended to the upper left cell, giving (GA). For LCS(R 2, C 5), A does ...
If the tree is traversed from the bottom up with a bit vector telling which strings are seen below each node, the k-common substring problem can be solved in () time. If the suffix tree is prepared for constant time lowest common ancestor retrieval, it can be solved in () time. [2]
The longest increasing subsequence problem is closely related to the longest common subsequence problem, which has a quadratic time dynamic programming solution: the longest increasing subsequence of a sequence is the longest common subsequence of and , where is the result of sorting.
The problem of computing a longest common subsequence has been well studied in computer science. It can be solved in polynomial time by dynamic programming ; [ 5 ] this basic algorithm has additional speedups for small alphabets (the Method of Four Russians ), [ 6 ] for strings with few differences, [ 7 ] for strings with few matching pairs of ...
The above algorithm has worst-case time and space complexities of O(mn) (see big O notation), where m is the number of elements in sequence A and n is the number of elements in sequence B. The Hunt–Szymanski algorithm modifies this algorithm to have a worst-case time complexity of O ( mn log m ) and space complexity of O ( mn ) , though it ...
For r = 3 and s = 2, the formula tells us that any permutation of three numbers has an increasing subsequence of length three or a decreasing subsequence of length two. Among the six permutations of the numbers 1,2,3: 1,2,3 has an increasing subsequence consisting of all three numbers; 1,3,2 has a decreasing subsequence 3,2
In number theory and computer science, the partition problem, or number partitioning, [1] is the task of deciding whether a given multiset S of positive integers can be partitioned into two subsets S 1 and S 2 such that the sum of the numbers in S 1 equals the sum of the numbers in S 2. Although the partition problem is NP-complete, there is a ...