Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31 , No. 16-1466, 585 U.S. ___ (2018), abbreviated Janus v. AFSCME , is a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court on US labor law , concerning the power of labor unions to collect fees from non-union members.
In June 2018, the Supreme Court decision in the case of Janus v. AFSCME found that application of public sector union fees to government employees who are not union members represents compelled speech, and as such is a violation of First Amendment rights. This decision by the Supreme Court potentially reduces funding for Unions that represent ...
Janus v. AFSCME. Huebert said Lackie’s argument will be similar to Janus v. AFSCME, which is a case the Liberty Justice Center took to the Supreme Court in June 2018 with a 5-4 victory.
Following the Supreme Court's 2018 Janus v. AFSCME case, which ended the compulsion of non-union, public employees to pay agency fees, or what are colloquially known as 'fair-share fees,' the NEA's total membership and agency fee payers dropped from 3,074,841 on its November 28, 2017, report [33] to 2,975,933 in its August 31, 2019, report, [34 ...
Several labor groups sued the Trump administration for allegedly firing tens of thousands of probationary employees illegally, as part of its drive to overhaul the federal government. In a ...
In February 2019, 38-year-old Michael Cochran died suddenly. Prosecutors said his wife Natalie Cochran poisoned him with insulin to conceal her over $2 million Ponzi scheme, which she operated ...
The Court had prepared to rule on Friedrichs v. California Teachers Ass'n, No. 14-915, 578 U.S. ___ (2016), which appeared to be ready to overturn Abood, but with the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, the case was closed on a deadlock 4–4 decision that left Abood in place. [9] Abood was overruled in Janus v.
Nos. 12-3176, 12-3644 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT CHRISTOPHER HEDGES, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. BARACK OBAMA, individually and as