enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Addington v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Addington_v._Texas

    Addington v. Texas, 441 U.S. 418 (1979), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court that set the standard for involuntary commitment for treatment by raising the burden of proof required to commit persons for psychiatric treatment from the usual civil burden of proof of "preponderance of the evidence" to "clear and convincing evidence".

  3. List of United States Supreme Court cases involving mental health

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Ultimately, Young instituted a federal habeas action. The court determined that the Community Protection Act was civil and, therefore, it could not violate the double jeopardy and ex post facto guarantees. On appeal, the Court of Appeals reasoned that the case turned on whether the Act was punitive "as applied" to Young. [4] 5th

  4. Involuntary treatment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Involuntary_treatment

    Involuntary treatment is compared to torture [8] [70] on at least two special reports of the UN, one noting "forced psychiatric interventions, when committed against persons with psychosocial disabilities, satisfies both intent and purpose required under the article 1 of the Convention against Torture, notwithstanding claims of 'good intentions ...

  5. Barefoot v. Estelle - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barefoot_v._Estelle

    Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880 (1983), is a United States Supreme Court case. [1] The Court ruled on the admissibility of clinical opinions given by two psychiatrists hired by the prosecution in answer to hypothetical questions regarding the defendant's future dangerousness and the likelihood that he would present a continuing threat to society in this Texas death penalty case.

  6. Ruiz v. Estelle - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruiz_v._Estelle

    Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas: Full case name: David Resendez Ruiz v. W.J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections : Decided: 1980 (original report) Citations: 503 F. Supp. 1265 (S.D. Tex. 1980), 550 F.2d 238: Case history; Prior action: Handwritten petition filed by David Resendez Ruiz ...

  7. United States federal laws governing defendants with mental ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_laws...

    It allows a person deemed "sexually dangerous" to be civilly committed after the expiration of a federal criminal sentence. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit found that civil commitments were within the power granted to Congress under the Constitution's Necessary and Proper Clause as an extension of the government's custodial ...

  8. Federal appeals court reverses ruling that found Mississippi ...

    www.aol.com/news/federal-appeals-court-reverses...

    A federal appeals court has overturned a lower court ruling that found Mississippi relies too much on institutionalizing people with mental health conditions rather than providing care in their ...

  9. Estelle v. Gamble - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estelle_v._Gamble

    Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 (1976), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States established the standard of what a prisoner must plead in order to claim a violation of Eighth Amendment rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Specifically, the Court held that a prisoner must allege acts or omissions sufficiently harmful to evidence deliberate ...