Ads
related to: sugar substitute pros and cons
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Among sugar substitutes, erythritol, monk fruit, allulose and steviol glycosides taste the most like sugar, while artificial sweeteners like aspartame leave a metallic, bitter aftertaste for many. ...
1. Maple syrup. Type: Natural sweetener. Potential benefits: Maple syrup is high in antioxidants and rich in minerals, including calcium, potassium, iron, zinc, and manganese.However, like other ...
Pros: Calorie- and sugar-free. Cons: No added benefits, like fiber or probiotics. ... Another thing Mohr wants people to keep in mind is that these drinks are “not a substitute for water.”
A sugar substitute is a food additive that provides a sweetness like that of sugar while containing significantly less food energy than sugar-based sweeteners, making it a zero-calorie (non-nutritive) [2] or low-calorie sweetener. Sugar substitute products are commercially available in various forms, such as small pills, powders and packets.
Sugar substitutes may also be linked to heart disease. Recent studies have found xylitol and erythritol — sugar alcohols used to tame the intense sweetness of stevia, monk fruit and lab-made ...
Aspartame is an artificial non-saccharide sweetener commonly used as a sugar substitute in foods and beverages. [4] 200 times sweeter than sucrose, it is a methyl ester of the aspartic acid/phenylalanine dipeptide with brand names NutraSweet, Equal, and Canderel. [4]
Ads
related to: sugar substitute pros and cons