Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
n 2 = m 0 + m −1 n 3 = m 1 + m −1. Convolutional codes can be systematic and non-systematic: systematic repeats the structure of the message before encoding; non-systematic changes the initial structure; Non-systematic convolutional codes are more popular due to better noise immunity. It relates to the free distance of the convolutional ...
The natural code rate of the configuration shown is 1/4, however, the inner and/or outer codes may be punctured to achieve higher code rates as needed. For example, an overall code rate of 1/2 may be achieved by puncturing the outer convolutional code to rate 3/4 and the inner convolutional code to rate 2/3.
Turbo codes, as described first in 1993, implemented a parallel concatenation of two convolutional codes, with an interleaver between the two codes and an iterative decoder that passes information forth and back between the codes. [6] This design has a better performance than any previously conceived concatenated codes.
A convolutional code that is terminated is also a 'block code' in that it encodes a block of input data, but the block size of a convolutional code is generally arbitrary, while block codes have a fixed size dictated by their algebraic characteristics. Types of termination for convolutional codes include "tail-biting" and "bit-flushing".
The Viterbi algorithm is named after Andrew Viterbi, who proposed it in 1967 as a decoding algorithm for convolutional codes over noisy digital communication links. [2] It has, however, a history of multiple invention, with at least seven independent discoveries, including those by Viterbi, Needleman and Wunsch, and Wagner and Fischer. [3]
The commonly used rule of thumb of a truncation depth of five times the memory (constraint length K-1) of a convolutional code is accurate only for rate 1/2 codes. For an arbitrary rate, an accurate rule of thumb is 2.5(K - 1)/(1−r) where r is the code rate. [1]
An example of a convolutional interleaver An example of a deinterleaver Efficiency of cross interleaver ( γ {\displaystyle \gamma } ): It is found by taking the ratio of burst length where decoder may fail to the interleaver memory.
But at certain dimensions, the packing uses all the space and these codes are the so-called "perfect" codes. The only nontrivial and useful perfect codes are the distance-3 Hamming codes with parameters satisfying (2 r – 1, 2 r – 1 – r, 3), and the [23,12,7] binary and [11,6,5] ternary Golay codes. [4] [5]