enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Hart–Fuller debate - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HartFuller_debate

    The HartFuller debate is an exchange between the American law professor Lon L. Fuller and his English counterpart H. L. A. Hart, published in the Harvard Law Review in 1958 on morality and law, which demonstrated the divide between the positivist and natural law philosophy. Hart took the positivist view in arguing that morality and law were ...

  3. The Concept of Law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Concept_of_Law

    The Concept of Law is a 1961 book by the legal philosopher H. L. A. Hart and his most famous work. [1] The Concept of Law presents Hart's theory of legal positivism—the view that laws are rules made by humans and that there is no inherent or necessary connection between law and morality—within the framework of analytic philosophy.

  4. H. L. A. Hart - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H._L._A._Hart

    Herbert Lionel Adolphus Hart FBA (/ h ɑːr t /; 18 July 1907 – 19 December 1992) was a British legal philosopher.One of the most influential legal theorists of the 20th century, he was instrumental in the development of the theory of legal positivism, which was popularised by his book, The Concept of Law.

  5. Legal positivism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_positivism

    H. L. A. Hart. Hart approved of Austin's theory of a sovereign but claimed that Austin's command theory failed in several important respects. Among the ideas Hart developed in The Concept of Law (1961) are: a critique of Austin's theory that a law is a command of the sovereign enforced by a threat of punishment;

  6. Lon L. Fuller - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lon_L._Fuller

    Fuller proposes principles that would easily fit into a positivistic account of law and Hart points out that Fuller's principles could easily accommodate an immoral morality. Other critics have challenged Fuller's claim that there is a prima facie obligation to obey all laws. Some laws, it is claimed, are so unjust and oppressive that there is ...

  7. Hart–Dworkin debate - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hart–Dworkin_debate

    The Hart–Dworkin debate is a debate in legal philosophy between H. L. A. Hart and Ronald Dworkin. At the heart of the debate lies a Dworkinian critique of Hartian legal positivism, specifically, the theory presented in Hart's book The Concept of Law. While Hart insists that judges are within bounds to legislate on the basis of rules of law ...

  8. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com/?icid=aol.com-nav

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  9. Legal process (jurisprudence) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_process_(jurisprudence)

    "Institutional Settlement." As the name suggests, the legal process school was deeply interested in the processes by which law is made, and particularly in a federal system, how authority to answer various questions is distributed vertically (as between state and federal governments) and horizontally (as between branches of government) and how this impacts on the legitimacy of decisions.