Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Yorty contended that the editorial cartoon had libeled him in two ways. The first defaming implication of the cartoon was that Yorty was obviously unqualified for high national office. [3]: 472 The newspaper defendants countered that the first implication was protected by the First Amendment as an expression of opinion. The Court stated that ...
From a historical perspective, political discourse would have been considerably poorer without such cartoons. Even if Nast's cartoons were not particularly offensive, Falwell argued that the Hustler parody advertisement in this case was so "outrageous" as to take it outside the scope of First Amendment protection. But "outrageous" is an ...
Aside from First Amendment issues, the Association does not take sides in political controversies. Formed in 1957 by a small group of newspaper cartoonists led by John Stampone of the Army Times , the AAEC was created to promote and stimulate public interest in the editorial page cartoon and to create closer contact among political cartoonists.
Editorial levity as the U.S. elections near... For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
The Supreme Court’s remarkably speedy decision Friday to allow a controversial ban on TikTok to take hold will have a dramatic impact on the tens of millions of Americans who visit the app every ...
The daily cartoon from The Independent's Voices section To order prints or signed copies of a selection of Independent cartoons, call or visit: independent.newsprints.co.uk To order prints or ...
The acknowledgement of religious freedom as the first right protected in the Bill of Rights points toward the American founders' understanding of the importance of religion to human, social, and political flourishing. The First Amendment makes clear that it sought to protect "the free exercise" of religion, or what might be called "free ...
This is why the First Amendment is not relevant in regards to Twitter’s ban on the former president, he says, because just like the hypothetical restaurant, Twitter is a private business.