Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Consensus is an ongoing process on Wikipedia; it is often better to accept a less-than-perfect compromise—with the understanding that the page is gradually improving—than to try to fight to implement a particular preferred version immediately.
Such lists are only lists of sources where consensus has been developed, and lack of inclusion on such a list doesn't imply that any unlisted sources either are, or aren't, usable. Other sources may require discussion to gain consensus that the source can be used for that particular content .
The Wikipedia List of online newspaper archives – Very extensive and useful list of websites to find sources at; The Wikipedia List of free online resources page – provides many resources for source searching; The Wikipedia List of search engines article – provides a list of additional search engines that can be utilized.
ipl2 - merger of the collections of resources from the Internet Public Library (IPL) and the Librarians' Internet Index (LII) websites, hosted by Drexel University College of Information Science and Technology; Refdesk - free and family-friendly web site that indexes and reviews quality, credible, and current web-based resources
Consensus. One of the most widely used terms on Wikipedia, and one of its bedrock principles. Astonishingly for such a basic procedural policy of the encyclopedia, by which all decisions are guided, nobody knows its true definition, for the simple reason that there have been no attempts to identify what consensus actually is. The lack of such a ...
Wikipedia editors have created custom Google search engines to help find sources on websites that Wikipedia editors have determined are generally more reliable. Several general search engines exist for more academic material, particularly scholarly articles, although some content will be behind a paywall: examples are Google Scholar , BASE and ...
Consensus is the key mechanism for determining what content ends up in the encyclopedia, and how editors behave towards each other. It is a long held principle, both in policy and in practice, that a consensus formed by a smaller group on a topic has less weight than one formed by a larger one.
Don't pretend a consensus you disagree with doesn't exist! Don't use local consensus to ignore wider consensus Don't close contentious discussions that you participated in: Don't canvass for support of your position Don't use tendentious editing to get your way