Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Disqualification is based on insurrection against the Constitution and not the government. The evidence of Donald Trump’s engaging in such insurrection is overwhelming.
Trump v. Anderson, 601 U.S. 100 (2024), is a U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously held that states could not determine eligibility for federal office, including the presidency, under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Thirty-three amendments to the United States Constitution have been approved by the Congress and sent to the states for ratification. Twenty-seven of these amendments have been ratified and are now part of the Constitution. The first ten amendments were adopted and ratified simultaneously and are known collectively as the Bill of Rights. Six ...
First through Lincoln’s aggressive use of his commander-in-chief powers, and then through amendments that knitted the states into a tighter union, the national government emerged from that ...
Without Trump, there would be no such thing as criminal immunity for presidents. Opinion - How Trump has changed and will change the Constitution Skip to main content
Donald Trump's eligibility to run in the 2024 U.S. presidential election was the subject of dispute due to his alleged involvement in the January 6 Capitol attack under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which disqualifies insurrectionists against the United States from holding office if they have previously taken ...
In some areas, however, Trump appears to be claiming powers that go well beyond the president's authority set out in the Constitution. He says he can, by executive order, rewrite the 14th ...
Republican Donald Trump's return to the presidency is expected to precipitate a shift in the U.S. government's legal stance in major cases pending at the Supreme Court, including a closely watched ...