enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_review

    Peer review is the evaluation of work by one or more people with similar competencies as the producers of the work ( peers ). [1] It functions as a form of self-regulation by qualified members of a profession within the relevant field. Peer review methods are used to maintain quality standards, improve performance, and provide credibility.

  3. Scholarly peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholarly_peer_review

    Scholarly peer review or academic peer review (also known as refereeing) is the process of having a draft version of a researcher's methods and findings reviewed (usually anonymously) by experts (or "peers") in the same field. Peer review is widely used for helping the academic publisher (that is, the editor-in-chief, the editorial board or the ...

  4. Software peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_peer_review

    The purpose of a peer review is to provide "a disciplined engineering practice for detecting and correcting defects in software artifacts, and preventing their leakage into field operations" according to the Capability Maturity Model . When performed as part of each Software development process activity, peer reviews identify problems that can ...

  5. Scientific journal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_journal

    Cover of the first issue of Nature (4 November 1869) In academic publishing, a scientific journal is a periodical publication designed to further the progress of science by disseminating new research findings to the scientific community. [1] These journals serve as a platform for researchers, scholars, and scientists to share their latest ...

  6. Academic publishing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_publishing

    Peer review is a central concept for most academic publishing; other scholars in a field must find a work sufficiently high in quality for it to merit publication. A secondary benefit of the process is an indirect guard against plagiarism since reviewers are usually familiar with the sources consulted by the author(s).

  7. 360-degree feedback - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/360-degree_feedback

    360-degree feedback. 360-degree feedback (also known as multi-rater feedback, multi source feedback, or multi source assessment) is a process through which feedback from an employee's subordinates, peers, colleagues, and supervisor (s), as well as a self-evaluation by the employee themselves is gathered. Such feedback can also include, when ...

  8. Systematic review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systematic_review

    A systematic review is a scholarly synthesis of the evidence on a clearly presented topic using critical methods to identify, define and assess research on the topic. [1] A systematic review extracts and interprets data from published studies on the topic (in the scientific literature), then analyzes, describes, critically appraises and summarizes interpretations into a refined evidence-based ...

  9. Peer critique - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_critique

    Peer critique, a specialized form of critique, is the common practice of professional peers, especially writers, reviewing and providing constructive criticism of each other's work before that work is turned in for credit or professional review. Writers in many genres and professions, including fiction writers and technical writers, use some ...