enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Argumentum ad baculum - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_baculum

    Argumentum ad baculum (Latin for "argument to the cudgel " or " appeal to the stick ") is the fallacy committed when one makes an appeal to force[ 1 ] to bring about the acceptance of a conclusion. [ 2 ][ 3 ] One participates in argumentum ad baculum when one emphasizes the negative consequences of holding the contrary position, regardless of ...

  3. Appeal to consequences - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_consequences

    Appeal to consequences. Appeal to consequences, also known as argumentum ad consequentiam (Latin for "argument to the consequence"), is an argument that concludes a hypothesis (typically a belief) to be either true or false based on whether the premise leads to desirable or undesirable consequences. [1] This is based on an appeal to emotion and ...

  4. List of fallacies - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies

    Argumentum ad baculum (appeal to the stick, appeal to force, appeal to threat) – an argument made through coercion or threats of force to support position. [ 89 ] Argumentum ad populum (appeal to widespread belief, bandwagon argument, appeal to the majority, appeal to the people) – a proposition is claimed to be true or good solely because ...

  5. Argument from authority - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority

    The argument from authority is a logical fallacy, [2] and obtaining knowledge in this way is fallible. [3][4] However, in particular circumstances, it is sound to use as a practical although fallible way of obtaining information that can be considered generally likely to be correct if the authority is a real and pertinent intellectual authority ...

  6. Appeal to emotion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_emotion

    Appeal to emotion or argumentum ad passiones (meaning the same in Latin) is an informal fallacy characterized by the manipulation of the recipient's emotions in order to win an argument, especially in the absence of factual evidence. [ 1 ] This kind of appeal to emotion is irrelevant to or distracting from the facts of the argument (a so-called ...

  7. Rhetoric of Donald Trump - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetoric_of_Donald_Trump

    Trump's rhetoric has been described as using "Argumentum ad baculum," or an appeal to force and intimidation to coerce behavior. [59] Trump has been noted to use either direct or veiled comments with plausible deniability suggesting the possibility of violence by his supporters.

  8. Talk:Argumentum ad baculum - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Argumentum_ad_baculum

    The original example would only fit the Ad Baculum pattern given in the article if its first line was "If you drive while drunk, someone will be put in jail." and the second was "You will be that someone". Indeed, as someone mentioned earlier on this discussion page, the first two lines can be simplified into one.

  9. Appeal to pity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_pity

    Appeal to pity. An appeal to pity (also called argumentum ad misericordiam, the sob story, or the Galileo argument) [1][2] is a fallacy in which someone tries to win support for an argument or idea by exploiting one's opponent's feelings of pity or guilt. It is a specific kind of appeal to emotion. The name "Galileo argument" refers to the ...