enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Condorcet method - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condorcet_method

    Example Condorcet method voting ballot. Blank votes are equivalent to ranking that candidate last. A Condorcet method (English: / k ɒ n d ɔːr ˈ s eɪ /; French: [kɔ̃dɔʁsɛ]) is an election method that elects the candidate who wins a majority of the vote in every head-to-head election against each of the other candidates, whenever there is such a candidate.

  3. Comparison of voting rules - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_voting_rules

    The authors showed that limiting any method to elections with no Condorcet winner (choosing the Condorcet winner when there was one) would never increase its susceptibility to tactical voting. They reported that the 'Condorcet-Hare' system which uses IRV as a tie-break for elections not resolved by the Condorcet criterion was as resistant to ...

  4. Condorcet paradox - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condorcet_paradox

    In social choice theory, Condorcet's voting paradox is a fundamental discovery by the Marquis de Condorcet that majority rule is inherently self-contradictory.The result implies that it is logically impossible for any voting system to guarantee that a winner will have support from a majority of voters: for example there can be rock-paper-scissors scenario where a majority of voters will prefer ...

  5. Negative responsiveness - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_responsiveness

    Negative responsiveness occurs in instant-runoff voting (IRV), [12] the single transferable vote, [3] and the two-round system. [11] Some quota-based apportionment methods also violate the rule, [13] as can the randomized Condorcet method in cases of cyclic ties. The participation criterion is closely-related, but different. While positive ...

  6. The End of the Voting Methods Debate - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/end-voting-methods-debate...

    Note that instant-runoff voting (indeed, all the ranked-choice methods), approval voting, STAR voting, Condorcet (and substantially all other advocated methods) have this same problem: They do not ...

  7. Voting criteria - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_criteria

    A voting system complying with the Condorcet loser criterion will never allow a Condorcet loser to win. A Condorcet loser is a candidate who can be defeated in a head-to-head competition against each other candidate. [11] (Not all elections will have a Condorcet loser since it is possible for three or more candidates to be mutually defeatable ...

  8. Condorcet winner criterion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condorcet_winner_criterion

    Approval voting is a system in which the voter can approve of (or vote for) any number of candidates on a ballot. Approval voting fails the Condorcet criterion Consider an election in which 70% of the voters prefer candidate A to candidate B to candidate C, while 30% of the voters prefer C to B to A.

  9. Minimax Condorcet method - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimax_Condorcet_method

    In voting systems, the Minimax Condorcet method is a single-winner ranked-choice voting method that always elects the majority (Condorcet) winner. [1] Minimax compares all candidates against each other in a round-robin tournament , then ranks candidates by their worst election result (the result where they would receive the fewest votes).