Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In 2015, Fifth Third Bank was also fined twice by the CFPB for fraudulent practices: one for discriminatory auto-loan pricing for Black and Hispanic borrowers, for which it was penalized $18 ...
Fifth Third Bank on Tuesday said it agreed to pay $20 million in penalties imposed by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to settle a CFPB investigation into its auto insurance practices, and ...
A bank teller assists a customer at Fifth Third's branch on Fountain Square. On Tuesday, the agency said the bank will pay $5 million of its penalties for forcing vehicle insurance on borrowers ...
Operation Choke Point was an initiative of the United States Department of Justice beginning in 2013 [1] which investigated banks in the United States and the business they did with firearm dealers, payday lenders, and other companies that, while operating legally, were said to be at a high risk for fraud and money laundering.
Fifth Third Bank (5/3 Bank), the principal subsidiary of Fifth Third Bancorp, is a bank holding company headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio. Fifth Third operates 1,100 branches and 2,400 automated teller machines , [ 3 ] which are in 11 states: Ohio , Florida , Georgia , Illinois , Indiana , Kentucky , Michigan , North Carolina , South Carolina ...
Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer, 573 U.S. 409 (2014), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court found Employee stockownership fiduciaries have the same prudential duties as non-ESOP fiduciaries, as set by ERISA, except that they are not required to diversify their investments beyond shares of the employer's stock.
Fifth Third Bank agreed to pay a $15 million fine for sales practices and a $5 million fine for auto finance servicing activities. File: Fifth Third Bank paid tribute to Aretha Franklin by ...
New York v. Trump is a civil investigation and lawsuit by the office of the New York Attorney General (AG) alleging that individuals and business entities within the Trump Organization engaged in financial fraud by presenting vastly disparate property values to potential lenders and tax officials, in violation of New York Executive Law § 63(12).