Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Fractions such as 1 ⁄ 3 are displayed as decimal approximations, for example rounded to 0.33333333. Also, some fractions (such as 1 ⁄ 7, which is 0.14285714285714; to 14 significant figures) can be difficult to recognize in decimal form; as a result, many scientific calculators are able to work in vulgar fractions or mixed numbers.
That is, fractions aren't difficult to compare if the numerator is 1 (e.g., 1 ⁄ 2 is larger than 1 ⁄ 3, which in turn is larger than 1 ⁄ 4). However, comparisons become more difficult when both numerators and denominators are mixed: 3 ⁄ 4 is larger than 5 ⁄ 7 , which in turn is larger than 2 ⁄ 3 , though this cannot be determined by ...
The first non-medical calculator thing we tried was inspired by Dimitris131. They had been experimenting with interactive math proofs, where the user can go through the proof step-by-step with a different illustration for each step . They had an off-wiki prototype that we were able to bring on-wiki via the calculator template.
The powers of z are taken using −3π/2 < arg z ≤ π/2. [3] The first term is not needed when Γ( b − a ) is finite, that is when b − a is not a non-positive integer and the real part of z goes to negative infinity, whereas the second term is not needed when Γ( a ) is finite, that is, when a is a not a non-positive integer and the real ...
The absorption coefficient is fundamentally the product of a quantity of absorbers per unit volume, [cm −3], times an efficiency of absorption (area/absorber, [cm 2]). Several sources [ 2 ] [ 12 ] [ 3 ] replace nσ λ with k λ r , where k λ is the absorption coefficient per unit density and r is the density of the gas.
The Electronic Delay Storage Automatic Calculator (EDSAC) was an early British computer. [1] Inspired by John von Neumann 's seminal First Draft of a Report on the EDVAC , the machine was constructed by Maurice Wilkes and his team at the University of Cambridge Mathematical Laboratory in England.
There are many different effective medium approximations, [5] each of them being more or less accurate in distinct conditions. Nevertheless, they all assume that the macroscopic system is homogeneous and, typical of all mean field theories, they fail to predict the properties of a multiphase medium close to the percolation threshold due to the absence of long-range correlations or critical ...