Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The PRISMA flow diagram, depicting the flow of information through the different phases of a systematic review. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) is an evidence-based minimum set of items aimed at helping scientific authors to report a wide array of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, primarily used to assess the benefits and harms of a health care ...
[1] [2] The methods described by Pocock [3] [4] and O'Brien & Fleming, [5] among others, [6] [7] [8] are popular implementations of group sequential testing for clinical trials. [ 9 ] [ 10 ] [ 11 ] Sometimes interim analyses are equally spaced in terms of calendar time or the information available from the data, but this assumption can be ...
A literature review is an overview of previously published works on a particular topic. The term can refer to a full scholarly paper or a section of a scholarly work such as books or articles. Either way, a literature review provides the researcher /author and the audiences with general information of an existing knowledge of a particular topic.
A notable marker of primary research is the inclusion of a "methods" section, where the authors describe how the data was generated. Common examples of secondary research include textbooks, encyclopedias, news articles, review articles, and meta analyses. [2] [3]
A systematic review is a scholarly synthesis of the evidence on a clearly presented topic using critical methods to identify, define and assess research on the topic. [1] A systematic review extracts and interprets data from published studies on the topic (in the scientific literature), then analyzes, describes, critically appraises and summarizes interpretations into a refined evidence-based ...
A review article is an article that summarizes the current state of understanding on a topic within a certain discipline. [1] [2] A review article is generally considered a secondary source since it may analyze and discuss the method and conclusions in previously published studies.
Unlike other scientific literature, such as scientific journals and the proceedings of some academic conferences, technical reports rarely undergo comprehensive independent peer review before publication. They may be considered as grey literature. Where there is a review process, it is often limited to within the originating organization.
Members of the Canadian Pediatric Society’s Adolescent Health Committee stated "there are significant limitations, biases, and inaccuracies within the Review", that "the Review has been noted to include incorrect citations of evidence (6) and inaccurate, sometimes scientifically disproven speculations", and concluded "The Cass Review is a ...